Study on dynamic effect of bonded prestressed concrete frame ª¤structures in resisting progressive collapse(PDF)

¡¶½¨Öþ¿ÆѧÓ빤³Ìѧ±¨¡·[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

Issue:

2026Äê01ÆÚ

Page:

173-182

Research Field:

½¨Öþ½á¹¹

Publishing date:

Info

Title:

Study on dynamic effect of bonded prestressed concrete frame ª¤structures in resisting progressive collapse

Author(s):

LI Zhi¹; 2;  MAI Caixia²;  CHEN Mingzhe²;  CHU Yixuan²;  QIAN Kai¹; 2

£¨1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Green Building Materials and Construction Industrialization, Guilin University of? Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China;?

2. School of Civil Engineering, Guilin University of Technology,? Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China£©

Keywords:

progressive collapse;  prestressed concrete;  bonded postª²tensioned strand;  finite element analysis;  dynamic effect

PACS:

TU378.8

DOI:

10.19815/j.jace.2024.12005

Abstract:

A high-precision finite element model of bonded prestressed concrete (BPC) frame structure was established by ANSYS/LS/DYNA finite element analysis software, and the instantaneous column removal dynamic test of BPC frame structure was simulated and analyzed. The accuracy of the highª²precision numerical simulation results was verified by comparing with the collapse test data of BPC frame substructure. On this basis, the influences of prestress degree, prestressed reinforcement ratio, prestressed reinforcement arrangement and weight distribution position on the dynamic effect of BPC structure were discussed. The results show that the increase of prestress degree and prestressed reinforcement ratio can improve the resistance but weaken the deformation capacity of the structure. The vertical stiffness of the linear prestressed tendon arrangement is about 1.17 times that of the parabolic arrangement. When the number of equal parts of the counterweight steel plate increases from 6 to 12, the peak displacement of the structure is reduced by 21.0%, and the vertical stiffness is increased by 26.5%. By comparing the two different boundary conditions, it can be seen that the first peak displacement and equilibrium displacement of the specimen with boundary condition two (actual edge column size) are increased by 17.5% and 34.1% respectively compared to those with boundary condition one (enlarged edge column size). The boundary one is safer than boundary two, but it will underestimate the dynamic effect of the structure. The two boundary conditions have their own advantages and disadvantages, which are suitable for multiple research objectives and experimental environments, and are of great significance for deepening the understanding of the mechanism of structural progressive collapse resistance.

References:

£Û1£ÝGRIFFITHS H,PUGSLEY A, SAUNDERS O A. Report of the inquiry into the collapse of flats atRonan Point, Canning Town: presented to the Minister of Housing and LocalGovernment[M].London: Her/His Majesty¬ðs StationeryOffice, 1968.

£Û2£ÝBA¦nANT Z P, ZHOU Y. Why did the world trade center collapse£¿ ¡ª simple analysis[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2002, 128(1):2-6.

£Û3£ÝÇ®¿­,»Æ־ǿ,ÎÌÔËê»,µÈ.ÐâÊ´RC¿ò¼Ü½á¹¹Á¬Ðøµ¹Ëú¿¹Á¦»úÖÆÑо¿[J].½¨Öþ½á¹¹Ñ§±¨,2022,43(9):181-190.

QIAN Kai, HUANG Zhiqiang, WENG Yunhao, etal. Study on load resisting mechanism of corroded RC frame structures againstprogressive collapse[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2022, 43(9): 181-190.

£Û4£ÝYI W J, HE Q F,XIAO Y, et al. Experimental study on progressive collapse-resistant behavior ofreinforced concrete frame structures[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2008, 105(4):433-439.

£Û5£ÝDIAO M Z, LI Y,GUAN H, et al. Influence of horizontal restraints on the behaviour of verticaldisproportionate collapse of RC moment frames[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis,2020, 109: 104324.

£Û6£ÝÇ®¿­,ÀîÒ×.»ìÄýÍÁ½á¹¹¿¹Á¬Ðøµ¹ËúÑо¿×ÛÊö[J].½¨Öþ¿ÆѧÓ빤³Ìѧ±¨,2022,39(3):1-28.

QIAN Kai, LI Yi. Review of study onprogressive collapse resistance of RC structures[J]. Journal of Architectureand Civil Engineering, 2022, 39(3): 1-28.

£Û7£ÝMAHROUS A, EHABM, SALEM H. Progressive collapse assessment of post-tensioned reinforcedconcrete flat slab structures using AEM[J]. Engineering Failure Analysis, 2020,109: 104278.

£Û8£ÝQIAN K, ZHANG XD, FU F, et al. Progressive collapse-resisting mechanisms of planar prestressedconcrete frame[J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2019, 116(4): 77-90.

£Û9£ÝQIAN K, LIANG SL, FENG D C, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on progressivecollapse resistance of post-tensioned precast concrete beam-columnsubassemblages[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2020, 146(9): 04020170.

£Û10£ÝKEYVANI L,SASANI M. Analytical and experimental evaluation of progressive collapseresistance of a flat-slab posttensioned parking garage[J]. Journal ofStructural Engineering, 2015, 141(11): 04015030.

£Û11£ÝKEYVANI L,SASANI M. Response of a post-tensioned floor following a column loss[J].Special Publication, 2016, 309: 1-18.

£Û12£ÝQIAN K, LIUY,YANG T, et al. Progressive collapse resistance of posttensioned concrete beam-columnsubassemblages with unbonded posttensioning strands[J]. Journal of StructuralEngineering, 2018, 144: 04017182.

£Û13£ÝHUSAIN M, YU J,OSMAN B H, et al. Progressive collapse resistance of post-tensioned concretebeam-column assemblies under a middle column removal scenario[J]. Journal ofBuilding Engineering, 2021, 34: 101945.

£Û14£ÝQIAN K, HU H N,WENG Y H, et al. Numerical investigation on load transfer mechanism of bondedpost-tensioned concrete beam-column substructures against progressive collapse[J].Advances in Structural Engineering, 2021, 24(8): 1569-1582.

£Û15£ÝµËС·¼,ÀîÖÎ,ÎÌÔËê»,µÈ.Ô¤Ó¦Á¦»ìÄýÍÁÁº-Öù×ӽṹ¿¹Á¬Ðøµ¹ËúÐÔÄÜÊÔÑéÑо¿[J].½¨Öþ½á¹¹Ñ§±¨,2019,40(8):71-78.

DENG Xiaofang, LI Zhi, WENG Yunhao, et al.Experimental study on performance of prestressed concrete beam-columnsubstructure against progressive collapse[J]. Journal of Building Structures,2019, 40(8): 71-78.

£Û16£ÝKIM J, CHOI H.Monotonic loading tests of RC beam-column subassemblage strengthened to preventprogressive collapse[J]. International Journal of Concrete Structures andMaterials, 2015, 9(4): 401-413.

£Û17£Ý½ðä¯,À¼¶¬­G,µËС·¼,µÈ.ÎÞð¤½áÔ¤Ó¦Á¦Áº-Öù×ӽṹ¿¹Á¬Ðøµ¹Ëú»úÀíÑо¿[J].½¨Öþ½á¹¹Ñ§±¨,2023,44(1):68-79.

JIN Liu, LAN Dongqiu, DENG Xiaofang, et al.Study on progressive collapse mechanisms of unbonded prestressed beam-columnsub-assemblages[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2023, 44(1): 68-79.

£Û18£ÝÀ¼¶¬­G,µËС·¼,½ðä¯,µÈ.´Î±ßÔµÖùʧЧÏÂÔ¤Ó¦Á¦»ìÄýÍÁ¿ò¼Ü¿¹Á¬Ðøµ¹ËúÐÔÄÜÑо¿[J].¹¤³ÌÁ¦Ñ§,2023,40(10):58-70.

LAN Dongqiu, DENG Xiaofang, JIN Liu, et al.Progressive collapse performance of prestressed concrete frames underpenultimate column removal scenario[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2023, 40(10): 58-70.

£Û19£ÝZHANG W S,ZHANG L, YANG T. Dynamic experiments on post-tensioned beam-columnsubstructures following the sudden removal of a single interior column[J].Journal of Building Engineering, 2022, 49: 103876.

£Û20£ÝZHANG W S.Progressive collapse of post-tensioned subframes following the removal of aninterior column[J]. Engineering Structures, 2022, 254: 113841.

£Û21£ÝºúÏþ·¼.Ô¤Ó¦Á¦»ìÄýÍÁ¿ò¼Ü¿¹Á¬Ðøµ¹ËúÐÔÄÜÑо¿£ÛD£Ý.³¤É³:ºþÄÏ´óѧ,2019.

HU Xiaofang. Research on performance ofprestressed concrete frame against progressive collapse£ÛD£Ý. Changsha: Hunan University, 2019.

£Û22£ÝDENG X F, LIANGS L, FU F, et al. Effects of high-strength concrete on progressive collapseresistance of reinforced concrete frame[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering,2020, 146(6): 04020078.

£Û23£ÝYU J, TAN K H.Structural behavior of RC beam-column sub-assemblages under a middle columnremoval scenario[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2013, 139(2): 233-250.

£Û23£ÝYU J, TAN K H.Structural behavior of RC beam-column subassemblages under a middle columnremoval scenario[J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, 2013, 139(2): 233-250.

£Û24£ÝÍõÓ¢,¹ËÏéÁÖ,ÁÖ·å.¿¼ÂÇѹ¹°Ð§Ó¦µÄ¸Ö½î»ìÄýÍÁË«¿çÁºÊúÏò³ÐÔØÁ¦·ÖÎö[J].½¨Öþ½á¹¹Ñ§±¨,2013,34(4):32-42.

WANG Ying, GU Xianglin, LIN Feng. Verticalbearing capacity of RC two-bay beams considering compressive arch action[J].Journal of Building Structures, 2013, 34(4): 32-42.

Memo

Memo:

-

Common functions