|Table of Contents|

Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse Resistance of 3D Steel Frame-composite Floor Substructures with Different Connection Types(PDF)

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

Issue:
2022年03期
Page:
75-83
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse Resistance of 3D Steel Frame-composite Floor Substructures with Different Connection Types
Author(s):
REN Lu-ming12 YANG Bo12 KONG De-yang3
(1. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 3. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117576, Singapore)
Keywords:
progressive collapse steel frame-composite floor substructure connection type experimental study load-resisting mechanism
PACS:
TU398
DOI:
10.19815/j.jace.2021.08083
Abstract:
To investigate the progressive collapse resistance of three-dimensional steel frame-composite floor structures, pseudo-static tests were carried out on four 1/3 down-scaled composite floor specimens with different connections under external column removal scenarios. The girder-to-column connections adopted flush-end-plate(FEP)connections, reverse channel(RC)connections, reduced beam section(RBS)connections and welded unreinforced flange-bolted web(WUFB)connections, while the girder-to-column and beam-to-girder connections employed double angle-cleat(DAC)connections and fin plate(FP)connections. The displacement-controlled uniform loading was applied by the specially designed 6-point loading system, and the load-displacement responses during the whole loading process and the failure modes of 3D composite floor systems were obtained. The influences offlexural action(FA), catenary action(CA)and tensile membrane action(TMA)on progressive collapse resistance were analyzed. The results demonstrate that, in terms of girder-to-column connections, the specimen with WUFB connections shows higher initial stiffness and load-carrying capacity, while the specimen with RC connections shows better ductility, and specimen with RBS connections has the best energy absorption capacity during the failure process. In terms of girder-to-column and beam-to-girder connections, the specimen with FP connections shows obvious brittle failure characteristics, while the other specimens employed DAC connections fail in a ductile way. FA plays a leading role in progressive collapse resistance under the external column failure, while TMA plays a certain role at large deformation stage. The contribution of CA is small and negligible.

References:

[1] FU Q N,YANG B,HU Y,et al.Dynamic Analyses of Bolted-angle Steel Joints Against Progressive Collapse Based on Component-based Model[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2016,117:161-174.
[2]MAIN J A,SADEK F.Modeling and Analysis of Single-plate Shear Connections Under Column Loss[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2014,140(3):04013070.
[3]OOSTERHOF S A,DRIVER R G.Performance of Steel Shear Connections Under Combined Moment,Shear,and Tension[C]//ASCE.Structures Congress 2012.Chicago:ASCE,2012:146-157.
[4]陈俊岭,舒文雅,李金威.框架结构典型梁柱节点的抗连续倒塌性能[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(1):53-58,135.
CHEN Jun-ling,SHU Wen-ya,LI Jin-wei.Performance of Various Steel Moment Connections Under Progressive Collapse Scenario[J].Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science),2016,44(1):53-58,135.
[5]郑 龙,王文达,李华伟,等.钢管混凝土柱-钢梁穿心螺栓外伸端板式节点抗连续倒塌性能研究[J].建筑结构学报,2019,40(11):140-149.
ZHENG Long,WANG Wen-da,LI Hua-wei,et al.Research on Performance of CFST Column to Steel Beam Joint with Through Bolts-extended Endplate Against Progressive Collapse[J].Journal of Building Structures,2019,40(11):140-149.
[6]YANG B,TAN K H.Numerical Analyses of Steel Beam-column Joints Subjected to Catenary Action[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2012,70:1-11.
[7]YANG B,TAN K H.Experimental Tests of Different Types of Bolted Steel Beam-column Joints Under a Central-column-removal Scenario[J].Engineering Structures,2013,54:112-130.
[8]GUO L H,GAO S,FU F,et al.Experimental Study and Numerical Analysis of Progressive Collapse Resistance of Composite Frames[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2013,89:236-251.
[9]KHANDELWAL K,EL-TAWIL S,KUNNATH S K,et al.Macromodel-based Simulation of Progressive Collapse:Steel Frame Structures[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2008,134(7):1070-1078.
[10]孟 宝,钟炜辉,郝际平.基于节点刚度的钢框架梁柱子结构抗倒塌性能试验研究[J].工程力学,2018,35(6):88-96.
MENG Bao,ZHONG Wei-hui,HAO Ji-ping.Experimental Study on Anti-collapse Performance for Beam-to-column Assemblies of Steel Frame Based on Joint Stiffness[J].Engineering Mechanics,2018,35(6):88-96.
[11]KIM J,AN D.Evaluation of Progressive Collapse Potential of Steel Moment Frames Considering Catenary Action[J].The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,2009,18(4):455-465.
[12]QIAN K,LI B.Effects of Masonry Infill Wall on the Performance of RC Frames to Resist Progressive Collapse[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2017,143(9):04017118.
[13]玄 伟,王 来,陈惠荣,等.方钢管混凝土柱-组合梁框架抗连续倒塌性能试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2019,40(11):102-111.
XUAN Wei,WANG Lai,CHEN Hui-rong,et al.Experimental Investigation on Progressive Collapse Behavior of Concrete-filled Square Steel Tubes-composite Beam Frame[J].Journal of Building Structures,2019,40(11):102-111.
[14]YANG B,TAN K H,XIONG G,et al.Experimental Study About Composite Frames Under an Internal Column-removal Scenario[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2016,121:341-351.
[15]ALASHKER Y,EL-TAWIL S,SADEK F.Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel-concrete Composite Floors[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2010,136(10):1187-1196.
[16]DINU F,MARGINEAN I,DUBINA D,et al.Experimental Testing and Numerical Analysis of 3D Steel Frame System Under Column Loss[J].Engineering Structures,2016,113:59-70.
[17]FU Q N,TAN K H.Parametric Effects on Composite Floor Systems Under Column Removal Scenario[J].Engineering Structures,2019,187:161-176.
[18]FU Q N,TAN K H,ZHOU X H,et al.Load-resisting Mechanisms of 3D Composite Floor Systems Under Internal Column-removal Scenario[J].Engineering Structures,2017,148:357-372.
[19]LI H H,CAI X H,ZHANG L,et al.Progressive Collapse of Steel Moment-resisting Frame Subjected to Loss of Interior Column:Experimental Tests[J].Engineering Structures,2017,150:203-220.
[20]任鲁明,杨 波,孔德阳.不同边界条件下采用半刚性节点三维组合楼板子结构连续倒塌行为试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2020,41(5):34-42.
REN Lu-ming,YANG Bo,KONG De-yang.Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse Behaviour of 3D Steel-concrete Floor Substructures with Semi-rigid Connections Under Different Boundary Conditions[J].Journal of Building Structures,2020,41(5):34-42.
[21]YI W J,ZHANG F Z,KUNNATH S K.Progressive Collapse Performance of RC Flat Plate Frame Structures[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2014,140(9):04014048.
[22]KONG D Y,YANG B,ELCHALAKANI M,et al.Progressive Collapse Resistance of 3D Composite Floor System Subjected to Internal Column Removal: Experiment and Numerical Simulation[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2020,172:106208.
[23]ZHANG J Z,LI G Q,JIANG J.Collapse of Steel-concrete Composite Frame Under Edge-column Loss — Experiment and Its Analysis[J].Engineering Structures,2020,209:109951.
[24]QIAN Q,LI B.Dynamic Performance of RC Beam-column Substructures Under the Scenario of the Loss of a Corner Column — Experimental Results[J].Engineering Structures,2012,42:154-167.
[25]LU X Z,LIN K Q,LI Y,et al.Experimental Investigation of RC Beam-slab Substructures Against Progressive Collapse Subject to an Edge-column-removal Scenario[J].Engineering Structures,2017,149:91-103.
[26]MA F H,GILBERT B P,GUAN H,et al.Experimental Study on the Progressive Collapse Behaviour of RC Flat Plate Substructures Subjected to Corner Column Removal Scenarios[J].Engineering Structures,2019,180:728-741.
[27]张 雷,李泓昊.钢框架结构抗连续性倒塌性能试验研究[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2018,48(4):687-691.
ZHANG Lei,LI Hong-hao.Experimental Study on Progressive Collapse Resistance of Steel Framed Structures[J].Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition),2018,48(4):687-691.
[28]WANG J J,WANG W,BAO Y H,et al.Full-scale Test of a Steel Moment-resisting Frame with Composite Floor Under a Penultimate Edge Column Removal Scenario[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2019,162:105717.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-05-30