|Table of Contents|

Finite element analysis of seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tubular column-steel beam with external reinforcement ring bolted joint(PDF)

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

Issue:
2024年04期
Page:
10-19
Research Field:
建筑结构
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Finite element analysis of seismic performance of concrete-filled steel tubular column-steel beam with external reinforcement ring bolted joint
Author(s):
DING Faxing1;  LUO Kaiyuan1;  LYU Fei1;  ZHANG Weizhen2;  HU Mingwen3
(1. School of Civil Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, Hunan, China; 2. Hunan Zhongda Designing Institute Co., Ltd., Changsha 410075, Hunan, China; 3. China Railway Urban Construction Group Co., Ltd., Changsha 410075, Hunan, China)
Keywords:
beam-column joint;  bolted connection;  seismic performance;  plastic energy dissipation mechanism;  rigid joint
PACS:
TU375.4
DOI:
10.19815/j.jace.2023.02095
Abstract:
In order to study the seismic performance of the bolted joints of concrete-filled steel tubular column-steel beam with external reinforcement ring bolted joint, a refined three-dimensional solid finite element model of the bolted joint was established, and the influence of the number of stiffening ribs and bolted joints on the plastic energy dissipation mechanism of the joints was investigated on the basis of verifying and analyzing the existing experimental results. The results show that when the ductile damage is considered in the late stage of the steel structure, the finite element calculation results are in better match with the existing static test results. The CFST-1 joint(beam height is 300 mm and with bolt spacer)has the best energy consumption capacity compared to the corresponding welded joint, but only up to half, and the CFST-3 joint(beam height is 300 mm and without bolt spacer)and the CFST-2 joint(beam height is 250 mm and with bolt spacer)have a lower total energy consumption compared to the CFST-1 joint. The plastic energy distribution mechanism of each bolt joint mainly relies on beam energy dissipation, while the corresponding reinforcement ring welding joint mainly relies on beam and reinforcement ring energy dissipation. When the bolt joint adopts ring plate stiffening ribs, 4 rows of bolts and web stiffening ribs, the stiffness, bearing capacity and ductility are consistent with the corresponding welded joint, and the total plastic energy dissipation reaches 79.1% of that of the rigid joint, which basically reaches the seismic level of the rigid joint.

References:

[1] 韩林海.钢管混凝土结构——理论与实践[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2019.
HAN Linhai.Concrete-filled steel tubular structures:theory and practice[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Science Press,2019.
[2]VULCU C,STRATAN A,CIUTINA A,et al.Beam-to-CFT high-strength joints with external diaphragm.I:design and experimental validation[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2017,143(5):04017001.
[3]QIN X,WANG W,CHEN Y Y,et al.Experimental study of through diaphragm connection types under a column removal scenario[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2015,112:293-304.
[4]ZHANG A L,WANG Q,JIANG Z Q,et al.Experimental study of earthquake-resilient prefabricated steel beam-column joints with different connection forms[J].Engineering Structures,2019,187:299-313.
[5]吴东平,李 伟,陈焰周,等.钢管混凝土柱-钢梁边柱外加强环螺栓连接节点抗震性能[J].土木工程与管理学报,2022,39(1):75-79.
WU Dongping,LI Wei,CHEN Yanzhou,et al.Seismic performance of steel beam to concrete-filled steel tubular column bolted edge column joint with outside ring plates[J].Journal of Civil Engineering and Management,2022,39(1):75-79.
[6]张玉芬,周金富,朱 戈,等.高轴压比下复式钢管混凝土柱-钢梁连接节点抗震性能试验[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2018,35(6):57-65.
ZHANG Yufen,ZHOU Jinfu,ZHU Ge,et al.Experiment on seismic behavior of joint between composite CFST column and steel beam under high axial compression ratio[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2018,35(6):57-65.
[7]BAGHERI SABBAGH A,CHAN T M,MOTTRAM J T.Detailing of I-beam-to-CHS column joints with external diaphragm plates for seismic actions[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2013,88:21-33.
[8]QUAN C Y,WANG W,CHAN T M,et al.FE modelling of replaceable I-beam-to-CHS column joints under cyclic loads[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2017,138:221-234.
[9]LI W,MA D Y,XU L F,et al.Performance of concrete-encased CFST column-to-beam 3-D joints under seismic loading:analysis[J].Engineering structures,2022,252:113661.
[10]刘 坚,毛 捷,陈 原,等.方钢管约束型钢再生混凝土柱-钢梁节点抗震性能分析[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2018,35(3):25-34.
LIU Jian,MAO Jie,CHEN Yuan,et al.Seismic behavior of steel recycled concrete column and steel beam joint of square steel tube[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2018,35(3):25-34.
[11]吴东平,李 伟,商 晨,等.钢管混凝土柱-钢梁外加强环螺栓连接节点受力性能研究[J].武汉大学学报(工学版),2020,53(3):219-224.
WU Dongping,LI Wei,SHANG Chen,et al.Study on mechanical properties of bolted joint between steel beam and concrete filled steel tubular column with exterior diaphragm[J].Engineering Journal of Wuhan University,2020,53(3):219-224.
[12]DING F X,YIN G A,WANG L P,et al.Seismic performance of a non-through-core concrete between concrete-filled steel tubular columns and reinforced concrete beams[J].Thin-walled Structures,2017,110:14-26.
[13]谷利雄,丁发兴,张 鹏,等.钢-混凝土组合简支梁滞回性能非线性有限元分析[J].工程力学,2013,30(1):301-306.
GU Lixiong,DING Faxing,ZHANG Peng,et al.Nonlinear finite element analysis for hysteresis behaviors of simply supported steel-concrete composite beam[J].Engineering Mechanics,2013,30(1):301-306.
[14]DING F X,CAO Z Y,LYU F,et al.Practical design equations of the axial compressive capacity of circular CFST stub columns based on finite element model analysis incorporating constitutive models for high-strength materials[J].Case Studies in Construction Materials,2022,16:e01115.
[15]DING F X,WU X,XIANG P,et al.New damage ratio strength criterion for concrete and lightweight aggregate concrete[J].ACI Structural Journal,2021,118(6):165-178.
[16]LI B,DING F X,LU D R,et al.Finite element analysis of the mechanical properties of axially compressed square high-strength concrete-filled steel tube stub columns based on a constitutive model for high-strength materials[J].Materials,2022,15(12):4313.
[17]钢结构设计标准:GB 50017—2017[S]北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
Standard for design of steel structures:GB 50017—2010[S].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2018.
[18]TAO Z,HASSAN M K,SONG T Y,et al.Behaviour of hybrid stainless-carbon steel composite beam-column joints with blind bolts[C]//ISSE.Proceedings of the 14th International Symposium on Structural Engineering.Beijing:ISSE,2016:348-359.
[19]SORENSON H K.ABAQUS version 6.4:theory manual,users' manual,verification manual and example problems manual[M].Pawtucket:ABAQUS Inc,2003.
[20]庄 茁.基于ABAQUS的有限元分析和应用[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2009.
ZHUANG Zhuo.Finite element analysis and application based on ABAQUS[M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2009.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-07-20