|Table of Contents|

Large strain nonlinear consolidation analysis of sand drain foundation considering smearing effect(PDF)

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

Issue:
2024年06期
Page:
182-190
Research Field:
岩土工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Large strain nonlinear consolidation analysis of sand drain foundation considering smearing effect
Author(s):
CHEN Ming1; 2;  CAO Wengui1; 2;  CUI Penglu1; 2
(1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency, Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China)
Keywords:
sand drain foundation;  smearing effect;  nonlinear compression;  non-Darcy seepage;  large strain;  consolidation degree
PACS:
TU470
DOI:
10.19815/j.jace.2023.01008
Abstract:
Assuming that the seepage in the soil conformed to non-Darcy seepage, the nonlinear compression characteristics of soft soil were described by introducing a double logarithmic model between effective stress, permeability coefficient, and void ratio. A large deformation consolidation model for sand drain foundation that could simultaneously consider the smearing effect was established, and the model was solved using finite difference method. The reliability of the solution was verified by comparing the degenerate numerical solution with the analytical solution under equal strain conditions and existing experiments. The parameters that affect the nonlinear consolidation of sand drain foundation were analyzed. The results show that among the three modes of considering the smearing effect, the fastest consolidation occurs when the permeability coefficient of the smearing zone changes parabolically, and the slowest consolidation occurs when it is a constant. Compared to a constant permeability coefficient, when the permeability coefficient of the smearing zone changes linearly, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 35.7%, and the maximum relative deviation of settlement amount reaches 26.7%. When the permeability coefficient of the smearing zone changes in a parabolic pattern, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 36.9%, and the maximum relative deviation of settlement amount reaches 28.4%. As the compression index and permeability index in the double logarithmic coordinate system increase, the consolidation rate of the sand drain foundation slows down.When the compression index increases, the final settlement increases, while the permeability index does not affect the final settlement. Compared to the compression index Ic=0.08, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 21.7% when Ic=0.1, and the final settlement deviation is 0.030 m. When Ic=0.12, the maximum relative deviation of the consolidation degree reaches 37.9%, and the maximum deviation of settlement reaches 0.059 m. Compared to the permeability index α=6, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 39.3% when α=10, and even reaches 61.9% when α=14. Considering non-Darcy seepage, the consolidation rate of sand drain foundation is slower, and the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree can reach 16.5%.

References:

[1] BASU D,BASU P,PREZZI M.Analytical solutions for consolidation aided by vertical drains[J].Geomechanics and Geoengineering,2006,1(1):63-71.
[2]WALKER R,INDRARATNA B.Vertical drain consolidation with parabolic distribution of permeability in smear zone[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2006,132(7):937-941.
[3]DAVIS E H,RAYMOND G P.A non-linear theory of consolidation[J].Géotechnique,1965,15(2):161-173.
[4]XIE K H,LEO C J.Analytical solutions of one-dimensional large strain consolidation of saturated and homogeneous clays[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2004,31(4):301-314.
[5]HANSBO S.Aspects of vertical drain design:Darcian or non-Darcian flow[J].Géotechnique,1997,47(5):983-992.
[6]ONOUE A,TING N H,GERMAINE J T,et al.Permeability of disturbed zone around vertical drains[C]//ASCE.Proceedings of the ASCE Geotechnical Engineering Congress.Reston:ASCE,1991:879-890.
[7]WALKER R,INDRARATNA B.Vertical drain consolidation with overlapping smear zones[J].Géotechnique,2007,57(5):463-467.
[8]许 波,雷国辉,郑 强,等.考虑涂抹区压缩及渗透系数变化的堆载预压固结解[J].岩土力学,2014,35(6):1607-1616.
XU Bo,LEI Guohui,ZHENG Qiang,et al.Solution of consolidation by surcharge preloading considering compressibility and varying hydraulic conductivities in smear zone[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2014,35(6):1607-1616.
[9]蔡 新,谢康和,徐 妍,等.初始孔压非均布条件下涂抹区渗透系数变化的砂井地基固结解[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(1):104-108.
CAI Xin,XIE Kanghe,XU Yan,et al.Analytical solution for consolidation of sand-drained ground under non-uniform distribution of initial excess pore water pressure and variation of permeability coefficient in smear zone[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2010,32(1):104-108.
[10]郭 彪,龚晓南,卢萌盟,等.土体水平渗透系数变化的多层砂井地基固结性状分析[J].工业建筑,2010,40(4):88-95.
GUO Biao,GONG Xiaonan,LU Mengmeng,et al.Consolidation behavior analysis of multi-layered sand drains foundation with varying horizontal permeability coefficient[J].Industrial Construction,2010,40(4):88-95.
[11]LU M M,WANG S Y,SLOAN S W,et al.Nonlinear radial consolidation of vertical drains under a general time-variable loading[J].International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2015,39(1):51-62.
[12]杨 鹏,蒲诃夫,郑俊杰,等.真空-堆载联合预压下竖井地基大变形非线性固结模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(10):2103-2111.
YANG Peng,PU Hefu,ZHENG Junjie,et al.A large-strain nonlinear consolidation model of saturated soft soils stabilized by the vacuum-surcharge combined preloading method[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(10):2103-2111.
[13]郭 霄,谢康和,卢萌盟,等.直排式真空预压法下竖井地基的非线性固结解析解[J].中南大学学报( 自然科学版),2018,49(2):384-392.
GUO Xiao,XIE Kanghe,LU Mengmeng,et al.Nonlinear analytical solution for consolidation of vertical drains by straight-line vacuum preloading method[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2018,49(2):384-392.
[14]HANSBO S.Consolidation of clay with special reference to influence of vertical sand drains[C]// Swedish Geotechnical Institute.Proceedings of Swedish geotechnical institute.Stickholm:Swedish Geotechnical Institute,1960:45-50.
[15]MILLER R J,LOW P F.Threshold gradient for water flow in clay systems[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1963,27(6):605-609.
[16]CUI P L,CAO W G,XU Z,et al.One-dimensional non-linear rheological consolidation of clayey soils with Swartzendruber's flow law[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2023,155:105201.
[17]BUTTERFIELD R.A natural compression law for soils(an advance on e-log p')[J].Géotechnique,1979,29(4):469-480.
[18]李传勋,仇 超.高压缩性软土一维非线性大应变固结解析解[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(11):2344-2356.
LI Chuanxun,QIU Chao.An analytical solution for one-dimensional nonlinear large-strain consolidation of soft clay with high compressibility[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2021,40(11):2344-2356.
[19]XIE K H,LU M M,LIU G B.Equal strain consolidation for stone columns reinforced foundation[J].International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2009,33(15):1721-1735.
[20]江文豪,詹良通.考虑井阻效应及径向渗透系数变化下砂井地基的大变形固结[J].岩土力学,2021,42(3):755-766.
JIANG Wenhao,ZHAN Liangtong.Large strain consolidation of sand-drained ground considering the well resistance and the variation of radial permeability coefficient[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2021,42(3):755-766.
[21]INDRARATNA B,RUJIKIATKAMJORN C,SATH ANANTHAN I.Radial consolidation of clay using compressibility indices and varying horizontal permeability[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2005,42(5):1330-1341.
[22]谢康和,曾国熙.等应变条件下的砂井地基固结解析理论[J].岩土工程学报,1989,11(2):3-17.
XIE Kanghe,ZENG Guoxi.Consolidation theories for drain wells under equal strain condition[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1989,11(2):3-17.
[23]李广信.高等土力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
LI Guangxin.Advanced soil mechanics[M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2004.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2024-12-10