|Table of Contents|

Anti-progressive Collapse Mechanism and Parameter Analysis of Circular CFST Column and Steel Bar Truss Composite Beam Joint(PDF)

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

Issue:
2022年03期
Page:
84-91
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Anti-progressive Collapse Mechanism and Parameter Analysis of Circular CFST Column and Steel Bar Truss Composite Beam Joint
Author(s):
WANG Jing-xuan LI Qiu-ying WANG Wen-qi
(School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China)
Keywords:
concrete-filled steel tube steel bar truss composite slab progressive collapse mechanism analysis parameter analysis
PACS:
TU398.9
DOI:
10.19815/j.jace.2021.05040
Abstract:
In order to study the influence of steel truss composite beam on the progressive collapse resistance of concrete-filled steel tubular(CFST)structure, ABAQUS was used to establish the numerical model of the joint of CFST column and steel bar truss composite beam. The failure mechanism and resistance calculation curve of the joint under the failure condition of middle column were analyzed, and the influences of main parameters such as the height of steel truss, concrete strength and steel strength on the progressive collapse resistance of composite joint were analyzed. The results show that compared with CFST column-RC composite beam joints, the peak bearing capacities of beam mechanism and catenary mechanism of reinforced truss composite beam joints increase by 12.5% and 10%, respectively. Since the steel bar truss can still provide tension after the yield of the lower chord steel bar, the bearing capacity of the lower flange of the steel beam can continue improving after the fracture, showing good progressive collapse resistance. The height of steel truss and the strength of steel truss mainly improve the peak bearing capacity and ultimate bearing capacity of joint beam mechanism, but have little effect on the peak bearing capacity of catenary mechanism. The strength of floor slab concrete has little effect on the bearing capacity of each stage of joint, and can reduce the ductility of joint. By comparing and analyzing the resistance index and displacement ductility index of joints under different parameters, it is found that the increases of height and strength of steel truss have beneficial effects on the ultimate bearing capacity of joints, which should be considered in engineering design and application.

References:

[1] Eurocode 1:Actions on Structures. Part 1-7:General Actions — Accidental Actions:EN 1991-1-7:2006[S].Brussels:CEN,2006.
[2]Progressive Collapse Analysis and Design Guidelines for New Federal Office Buildings and Major Modernization Projects:GSA 2016 [S].Washington DC:General Services Administration,2016.
[3]Design of Building to Resist Progressive Collapse:UFC 4-023-03[S].Washington DC:Department of Defense,2016.
[4]建筑结构抗倒塌设计规范:CECS 392:2014[S].北京:中国计划出版社,2014.
Code for Anti-collapse Design of Building Structures:CECS 392:2014[S].Beijing:China Planning Press,2014.
[5]ADAM J M,PARISI F,SAGASETA J,et al.Research and Practice on Progressive Collapse and Robustness of Building Structures in the 21st Century[J].Engineering Structures,2018,173:122-149.
[6]ZHONG W H,TAN Z,TIAN L M,et al.Collapse Resistance of Composite Beam-column Assemblies with Unequal Spans Under an Internal Column-removal Scenario[J].Engineering Structures,2020,206:110143.
[7]MENG B,ZHONG W H,HAO J P.Anti-progressive Collapse Behavior of Beam-to-column Assemblies with Bolted-angle Connections Under Different Span Ratios[J].Advances in Structural Engineering,2018,21(6):891-905.
[8]QIU L,LIN F,WU K C.Improving Progressive Collapse Resistance of RC Beam-column Subassemblages Using External Steel Cables[J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2020,34(1):04019079.
[9]王景玄,杨 永,周 侃,等.角柱失效下钢管混凝土柱-组合梁框架抗连续倒塌能力研究[J].工程力学,2022,39(5):105-118.
WANG Jing-xuan,YANG Yong,ZHOU Kan,et al.Research on Progressive Collapse Resistance Capacity of Composite Frame with CFST Columns Under Corner Column Removal Scenario[J].Engineering Mechanics,2022,39(5):105-118.
[10]ZHENG L,WANG W D,XIAN W.Experimental and Numerical Investigation on the Anti-progressive Collapse Performance of Fabricated Connection with CFST Column and Composite Beam[J].Engineering Structures,2022,256:114061.
[11]WANG J X,YANG Y,XIAN W,et al.Progressive Collapse Mechanism Analysis of Concrete-filled Square Steel Tubular Column to Steel Beam Joint with Bolted-welded Hybrid Connection[J].International Journal of Steel Structures,2020,20(5):1618-1635.
[12]高佳明,刘伯权,黄 华,等.带板钢筋混凝土框架连续倒塌理论分析[J].工程力学,2018,35(7):117-126.
GAO Jia-ming,LIU Bo-quan,HUANG Hua,et al.Theoretical Analysis on the Progressive Collapse of RC Frame Structures with Slabs[J].Engineering Mechanics,2018,35(7):117-126.
[13]王俊杰,王 伟,孙 昕.压型钢板组合梁中柱子结构的抗连续倒塌试验[J].工程力学,2017,34(增):149-153,178.
WANG Jun-jie,WANG Wei,SUN Xin.Experimental Behavior of Composite Beam-column Joints with Steel Profiled Decking in a Middle-column-removal Scenario[J].Engineering Mechanics,2017,34(S):149-153,178.
[14]陈安英,完海鹰,孙 磊,等.钢筋桁架组合楼板抗弯性能试验研究[J].建筑结构,2015,45(8):59-63,90.
CHEN An-ying,WAN Hai-ying,SUN Lei,et al.Experimental Study on Bending Behavior of Steel Bar Truss Composite Slab[J].Building Structure,2015,45(8):59-63,90.
[15]邓莎莎.现浇钢筋桁架混凝土楼板试验与理论研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2017.
DENG Sha-sha.Experimental and Theoretical Study on Cast-in-place Steel Bar Truss Concrete Slab[D].Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University,2017.
[16]韩林海.钢管混凝土结构:理论与实践[M].3版.北京:科学出版社,2016.
HAN Lin-hai.Concrete Filled Steel Tubular Structures:Theory and Practice[M].3rd ed.Beijing:Science Press,2016.
[17]ESMAEILY A,XIAO Y.Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Variable Axial Loads:Analysis[J].ACI Structural Journal,2005,102(5):736-744.
[18]KIM J,SHIN W S.Retrofit of RC Frames Against Progressive Collapse Using Prestressing Tendons[J].The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,2013,22(4):349-361.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2022-05-30