|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]郝安民,周德源.静力弹塑性分析中目标位移的研究及应用[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2009,26(04):120-126.
 HAO An-min,ZHOU De-yuan.Research and Application for Target Displacement in Static Elastoplastic Analysis[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2009,26(04):120-126.
点击复制

静力弹塑性分析中目标位移的研究及应用(PDF)
分享到:

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:
26卷
期数:
2009年04期
页码:
120-126
栏目:
出版日期:
2009-12-20

文章信息/Info

Title:
Research and Application for Target Displacement in Static Elastoplastic Analysis
作者:
郝安民周德源
同济大学土木工程学院,上海200092
Author(s):
HAO An-min, ZHOU De-yuan
School of Civil Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
关键词:
目标位移 能力谱方法 等效阻尼 基于能量的增量位移 非弹性需求谱
Keywords:
target displacement capacity spectrum method equivalent damp energy-based incremental displacement inelastic demand spectrum
分类号:
TU313
DOI:
-
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
对比研究了构建能力谱曲线的2种方法,即ATC-40中的能力谱方法和基于能量的增量位移方法,并利用强度折减系数-延性系数-线性周期关系构建了需求谱曲线; 以带梁式转换层的框支剪力墙结构为例,分析了改进方法应用于此类复杂高层建筑的可行性。结果表明:2种方法得到的能力谱曲线比较吻合,利用改进的能力谱方法得到的能力谱曲线更为平滑且稳定,确定的目标位移小于ATC-40中能力谱方法确定的目标位移,振型模式侧向荷载下的目标位移稍大于振型分解SRSS模式侧向荷载下的目标位移。
Abstract:
Two methods of building capacity spectrum curves were comparatively analyzed, e.g., ATC-40 capacity spectrum method and the energy-based incremental displacement method. Based on the relationships between strength reduction factor, ductility coefficient and linear period respectively, the two methods of building demand spectrum curves were proposed. Then, the methods were applied to a frame-supported shear-wall structure with beam transfer story to investigate their feasibilities in complex high-rise buildings. The results show that capacity spectrum curves from the two methods are similar; however, improved capacity spectrum method usually can obtain more smooth and stable curves. At the same time, the target displacement from improved capacity spectrum method is less than that of ATC-40 capacity spectrum method, and the target displacement from fundamental mode shape patterns is less than that of mode composition SRSS patterns.

参考文献/References:

[1] ATC-40,Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings[S].
[2]FEMA 273,NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings[S].
[3]Eurocode 8,Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance[S].
[4]GB 50011-2001,建筑抗震设计规范[S]. GB 50011-2001,Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S].
[5]王 力,李红玲.静力弹塑性设计方法(Pushover)的原理和改进[J].山西建筑,2003,29(17):8-9. WANG Li,LI Hong-ling.Principle and Improvement of Static Push-over Design Method[J].Shanxi Architecture,2003,29(17):8-9.
[6]FEMA 356,Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings[S].
[7]FEMA 440,Improvement of Nonlinear Static Seismic Analysis Procedures[S].
[8]CHOPRA A K,GOEL R K.Capacity-demand-diagram Methods for Estimating Seismic Deformation of Inelastic Structures:SDF Systems[R].Berkeley:University of California,1999.
[9]CHOPRA A K.Dynamics of Structures:Theory and Application to Earthquake Engineering[M].New Delhi:Pearson Eduction,2005.
[10]CHOPRA A K,GOEL R K.Evaluation of NSP to Estimate Seismic Deformation:SDF System[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2000,126(4):482-490.
[11]吕西林,周定松.考虑场地类别与设计分组的延性需求谱和弹塑性位移反应谱[J].地震工程与工程振动,2004,24(1):39-48. LU Xi-lin,ZHOU Ding-song.Ductility Demand Spectra and Inelastic Displacement Spectra Considering Soil Conditions and Design Characteristic Periods[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration,2004,24(1):39-48.
[12]HERNANDEZ-MONTES E, KWON O S, ASCHHEIM M A.An Energy Based Formulation for First and Multiple-mode Nonlinear Static(Pushover)Analyses[J].Journal of Earthquake Engineering,2004,8(1):69-88.
[13]JGJ 3-2002,高层建筑混凝土结构技术规程[S]. JGJ 3-2002,Technical Specification for Concrete Structures of Tall Building[S].
[14]梁启智.高层建筑结构分析与设计[M].广州:华南理工大学出版社,1999. LIANG Qi-zhi.High-rise Building Structural Analysis and Design[M].Guangzhou:South China University of Technology Press,1999.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2009-08-21
作者简介:郝安民(1980-),男,山东东明人,工学博士研究生,E-mail:tjham02@163.com。
更新日期/Last Update: 2009-12-20