«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:

36卷

期数:

2019年02期

页码:

77-83

栏目:

出版日期:

2019-03-26

文章信息/Info

Title:

Seismic Fragility Analysis of High-pier Multi-tower Cable-stayed Bridge Under Traveling Wave Effect

文章编号:

1673-2049(2019)02-0077-07

作者:

李立峰^1,2,曹方亮^1,2,胡思聪^1,2,陈明玉^1,2

(1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082; 2. 湖南大学 风工程与桥梁工程湖南省重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410082)

Author(s):

LI Li-feng^1,2, CAO Fang-liang^1,2, HU Si-cong^1,2, CHEN Ming-yu^1,2

(1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China; 2. Key Laboratory forWind and Bridge Engineering of Hunan Province, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China)

关键词:

斜拉桥;  行波效应;  地震易损性;  一致激励

Keywords:

cable-stayed bridge;  traveling wave effect;  seismic fragility;  uniform excitation

分类号:

TU311

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

为了研究行波效应对大跨高墩多塔斜拉桥抗震性能的影响,以一座超高墩四塔斜拉桥工程实例为分析对象,采用概率性的易损性分析方法,选用OpenSees抗震有限元分析软件,建立全桥非线性动力有限元模型。从PEER数据库中选取80条有代表性的地震波数据,采用位移输入法进行地震波的多点输入以计入行波效应的影响,考虑7种不同剪切波速和一致激励情况,完成全过程非线性分析。结合大桥特点,考虑3种纵向约束体系,选择支座、斜拉索、主梁和桥塔作为易损构件,并通过比较后选取PGD(地震波峰值位移)作为地震动强度指标,建立结构地震概率需求模型,计算和绘制了易损构件的易损性曲线,选择MPGD值(损伤超越概率P_f =50%对应构件的PGD值)作为构件损伤评价指标。结果表明:支座是最易损伤的构件,桥塔相对来说易损性最小; 行波效应对支座的抗震有利,对纵向全约束和半约束体系的抗震也有利; 随着波速的增加,各构件和体系的抗震水平基本趋于一致激励的结果。

Abstract:

In order to study the influence of traveling wave effect on seismic performance of long-span high-pier multi-tower cable-stayed bridge, a four-tower cable-stayed bridge with ultra high-pier was taken as the analysis object, and the fragility analysis method based on probability was used. The seismic finite element analysis software OpenSees was used to establish the nonlinear dynamic finite element model of whole bridge. A suite of 80 ground motions typically were selected from database PEER, and the displacement input method was used to carry out multi-point excitations to account for the influence of traveling wave effect. Considering seven different shear wave velocities and uniform excitation, the whole process of non-linear analysis was completed. According to the characteristics of bridge, considering three kinds of longitudinal restraint systems of whole bridge, the supports, cables, girders and pylons were selected as vulnerable members, and PGD(peak ground displacement)was selected as the index of earthquake ground motion intensity after comparison. The seismic probabilistic demand model of structures was established, the fragility curves of fragility members were calculated and drawn, and the MPGD(PGD value of component corresponding damage transcendence probability P_f = 50%)was selected as the damage evaluation index of components. The results show that the support is the most vulnerable component, and the tower is relatively minimal in vulnerability. The traveling wave effect is beneficial to the seismic resistance of the support, the longitudinal fully constraint and semi-constraint systems. With the increase of wave speed, the seismic resistance of various components and systems tends to be the result of uniform excitation.

参考文献/References:

References:
[1] ZHONG J,JEON J S,YUAN W,et al.Impact of Spatial Variability Parameters on Seismic Fragilities of a Cable-stayed Bridge Subjected to Differential Support Motions[J].Journal of Bridge Engineering,2017,22(6):04017013.
[2]ALLAM S M,DATTA T K.Seismic Behaviour of Cable-stayed Bridges Under Multi-component Random Ground Motion[J].Engineering Structures,1999,21(1):62-74.
[3]方 圆,李建中,彭天波,等.行波效应对大跨度多塔斜拉桥地震反应影响[J].振动与冲击,2010,29(10):148-152,235.
FANG Yuan,LI Jian-zhong,PENG Tian-bo,et al.Influence of Travelling-wave Effect on Seismic Response of a Long-span Multi-tower Cable Stayed Bridge[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2010,29(10):148-152,235.
[4]EN 1998-2:2005,Eurocode 8:Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance.Part 2:Bridges[S].
[5]JTG/T B02-01—2008,公路桥梁抗震设计细则[S].
JTG/T B02-01—2008,Guidelines for Seismic Design of Highway Bridges[S].
[6]耿方方,丁幼亮,谢洪恩,等.结构体系对多塔斜拉桥抗震性能的影响分析[J].公路交通科技,2014,31(7):65-71.
GENG Fang-fang,DING You-liang,XIE Hong-en,et al.Influences of Structural System on Seismic Performance of Multi-pylon Cable-stayed Bridge[J].Journal of Highway and Transportation Research and Development,2014,31(7):65-71.
[7]ATC-40,Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings[S].
[8]FEMA-273,NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings[S].
[9]胡思聪,李立峰,王连华.高墩多塔斜拉桥地震动强度指标选择及易损性评估[J].中国公路学报,2017,30(12):50-59.
HU Si-cong,LI Li-feng,WANG Lian-hua.Selection of Optimal Intensity Measures of Ground Motions and Seismic Fragility Assessment for Multi-span Cable-stayed Bridge with Tall Piers[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2017,30(12):50-59.
[10]李立峰,胡思聪,王连华,等.超高墩多塔混凝土斜拉桥纵向约束体系研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2015,35(1):85-93.
LI Li-feng,HU Si-cong,WANG Lian-hua,et al.Longitudinal Constraint Systems for Super High-pier Multi-span Concrete Cable-stayed Bridges[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2015,35(1):85-93.
[11]周国良,鲍叶欣,李小军,等.结构动力分析中多点激励问题的研究综述[J].世界地震工程,2009,25(4):25-32.
ZHOU Guo-liang,BAO Ye-xin,LI Xiao-jun,et al.Review on Dynamic Analyses of Structures Under Multi-support Excitation[J].World Earthquake Engineering,2009,25(4):25-32.
[12]张 凡,颜晓伟,李 帅,等.考虑波速影响的斜拉桥非一致激励地震响应研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2016,33(4):60-68.
ZHANG Fan,YAN Xiao-wei,LI Shuai,et al.Effects of Wave Velocities on Seismic Response of Cable-stayed Bridge Under Asynchronous Excitation[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2016,33(4):60-68.

[2]张亚辉,李丽媛,陈 艳,等.大跨度结构地震行波效应研究[J].大连理工大学学报,2005,45(4):480-486.
ZHANG Ya-hui,LI Li-yuan,CHEN Yan,et al.Wave Passage Effect on Random Seismic Response of Long-span Structures[J].Journal of Dalian University of Technology,2005,45(4):480-486.
[3]项海帆.斜张桥在行波作用下的地震反应分析[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,1983,11(2):1-9.
XIANG Hai-fan.Earthquake Response Analysis of Cable-stayed Bridges Under the Action of Travelling Waves[J].Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,1983,11(2):1-9.
[5]BOGDANOFF J L,GOLDBERG J E,SCHIFF A J.The Effect of Ground Transmission Time on the Response of Long Structures[J].Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America,1965,55(3):627-640.
[6]HEREDIA-ZAVONI E,VANMARCKE E H.Seismic Random-vibration Analysis of Multisupport-structural Systems[J].Journal of Engineering Mechanics,1994,120(5):1107-1128.
[7]NAZMY A S,ABDEL-GHAFFAR A M.Effects of Ground Motion Spatial Variability on the Response of Cable-stayed Bridges[J].Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics,1992,21(1):1-20.
[8]范立础.桥梁抗震[M].上海:同济大学出版社,1997.
FAN Li-chu.Bridge Seismic[M].Shanghai:Tongji University Press,1997.
[12]金立新,郭慧乾.多塔斜拉桥发展综述[J].公路,2010(7):24-29.
JIN Li-xin,GUO Hui-qian.Summary of Development of Multi-tower Cable-stayed Bridge[J].Highway,2010(7):24-29.
[16]ABBASI M,ZAKERI B,AMIRI G G.Probabilistic Seismic Assessment of Multiframe Concrete Box-girder Bridges with Unequal-height Piers[J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2016,30(2):04015016.
[17]YANG C S W,WERNER S D,DESROCHES R.Seismic Fragility Analysis of Skewed Bridges in the Central Southeastern United States[J].Engineering Structures,2015,83:116-128.
[21]李正农,楼梦麟.大跨度桥梁结构地震动输入问题的研究现状[J].同济大学学报:自然科学版,1999,27(5):592-597.
LI Zheng-nong,LOU Meng-lin.Research Status in Earthquake Input of Long-span Bridges[J].Journal of Tongji University:Natural Science,1999,27(5):592-597.
[22]范立础,王君杰,陈 玮.非一致地震激励下大跨度斜拉桥的响应特征[J].计算力学学报,2001,18(3):358-363.
FAN Li-chu,WANG Jun-jie,CHEN Wei.Response Characteristics of Long-span Cable-stayed Bridges Under Non-uniform Seismic Action[J].Chinese Journal of Computational Mechanics,2001,18(3):358-63.
[23]谢 文,孙利民.超大跨斜拉桥顺桥向地震损伤分析与控制[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2014,31(4):58-66.
XIE Wen,SUN Li-min.Seismic Damage Analysis and Control of Super Long-span Cable-stayed Bridges in Longitudinal Direction[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2014,31(4):58-66.

相似文献/References:

[1]杨晓艳,贡金鑫,张启伟.随机车辆荷载作用下斜拉索索力的概率模型及可靠度分析[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2014,31(02):90.
　[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2014,31(02):90.
[2]王 涛,沈锐利.列车荷载作用下铁路斜拉桥索-梁相关振动研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2015,32(06):92.
　WANG Tao,SHEN Rui-li.Research on Characteristics of Cable-beam Vibration of Railway Cable-stayed Bridge Under Train Load[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2015,32(02):92.
[3]王连华,丁秉昊,李立峰.斜拉桥锚拉板足尺模型疲劳试验[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2016,33(05):50.
　WANG Lian-hua,DING Bing-hao,LI Li-feng.Fatigue Test of Full-scale Model of Tensile Anchor Plate in Cable-stayed Bridge[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2016,33(02):50.
[4]周士金,刘荣桂,蔡东升,等.CFRP索和钢索斜拉桥地震响应分析与抗震验算[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2009,26(03):76.
　ZHOU Shi-jin,LIU Rong-gui,CAI Dong-sheng,et al.Seismic Response Analysis and Seismic Resistance Checking of Cable-stayed Bridges with CFRP Cables and Steel Cables[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2009,26(02):76.
[5]高剑,裴岷山.大跨度斜拉桥索梁锚箱空间受力分析[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2006,23(03):66.
　GAO Jian,PEI Min-shan.Analysis of Space Stress in Anchoring Box Between Cable andBeam of Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2006,23(02):66.
[6]赵人达,邹建波,吕 梁,等.大跨度叠合梁斜拉桥非线性稳定研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2018,35(04):11.
　ZHAO Ren-da,ZOU Jian-bo,LU Liang,et al.Research on Nonlinear Stability of Long-span Composite Girder Cable-stayed Bridge[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2018,35(02):11.
[7]赵人达,许智强,邹建波,等.基于ANSYS的大跨斜拉桥地震响应分析及性能评估[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2018,35(04):19.
　ZHAO Ren-da,XU Zhi-qiang,ZOU Jian-bo,et al.Seismic Response Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Long-span Cable-stayed Bridge Based on ANSYS[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2018,35(02):19.
[8]韩 石,刘永健,王振华,等.高寒地区组合梁斜拉桥施工阶段温度效应研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2021,38(05):107.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.04004]
　HAN Shi,LIU Yong-jian,WANG Zhen-hua,et al.Study on Temperature Effect of Composite Girder Cable-stayed Bridge During Construction in Alpine Region[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2021,38(02):107.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.04004]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2018-09-07
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51278183); 交通运输部建设科技项目(2013 318 798 320); 陕西省交通运输厅科技项目(17-19K)
作者简介:李立峰(1971-),男,湖南沅江人,教授,博士研究生导师,工学博士,E-mail:lilifeng@hnu.edu.cn。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-03-27