«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:

38卷

期数:

2021年05期

页码:

99-106

栏目:

出版日期:

2021-09-15

文章信息/Info

Title:

Field Test on Heat Transfer Efficiency and Thermal Mechanical Response of Energy Pile Foundation with Cap Under Embedded Depth

文章编号:

1673-2049(2021)05-0099-08

作者:

陈 玉¹,孔纲强^1,2,孟永东¹,王乐华¹,刘红程¹

(1. 三峡大学 三峡库区地质灾害教育部重点实验室,湖北 宜昌 443002; 2. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098)

Author(s):

CHEN Yu¹, KONG Gang-qiang^1,2, MENG Yong-dong¹, WANG Le-hua¹, LIU Hong-cheng¹

(1. Key Laboratory of Geological Hazards on Three Gorges Reservoir Area of Ministry of Education, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, Hubei, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing 210098, Jiangsu, China)

关键词:

能量桩;  基础埋深;  换热效率;  热力响应;  现场试验

Keywords:

energy pile;  embedded depth of foundation;  heat transfer efficiency;  thermal mechanical response;  field test

分类号:

TU443

DOI:

10.19815/j.jace.2021.03066

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

依托埋深条件下低承台2×2群桩基础,在钻孔灌注桩钢筋笼上绑扎换热管形成能量桩,布置振弦式应变计/温度计以测试桩身温度及热致应变。开展恒定水温(35 ℃)输入情况下,单根能量桩运行对邻近桩基、承台的热力响应特性试验; 实测进/出口水温随时间变化、桩身热致应变等变化规律,分析埋深条件对单根能量桩的换热效率及其对承台和邻近桩体热力响应特性的影响规律,并与无埋深条件下的换热效率、热力响应特性展开对比分析。结果表明:试验条件下,3 m埋深条件下的换热效率为2.65 kW,较无埋深条件下提升了约68%,体现出上覆回填土存在一定的持热能力; 有/无埋深条件下,桩身热致应力最大值分别出现在桩身中部及桩顶,分别为1.66 MPa和2.14 MPa; 随加热过程的进行,桩端阻力呈现先增大后逐渐下降至稳定值的变化趋势,在加热24 h后达到最大值约20 kPa,与进/出口温度差变化趋势一致; 有/无埋深条件下承台在加热工况均出现了细微的差异变形,在设计承台能量桩结构时应给予一定的考虑; 有/无埋深条件下承台最大热致应力值分别为0.65 MPa和2.34 MPa,对应的最大温度升幅分别为3.6 ℃和11.0 ℃。

Abstract:

Based on the low-cap 2×2 pile foundation under embedded depth condition, heat exchange tubes were tied on the bored pile reinforcement cage to form energy piles, and vibrating wire strain gauges/thermometers were arranged to test the temperature and thermal strain of the pile body. The thermal mechanical response characteristic test of a single energy pile operation to the adjacent pile foundation and cap under the constant input water temperature(35 ℃)was carried out; the inlet/outlet water temperature changing with time and the thermal strain of the pile body were measured. The heat transfer efficiency of a single energy pile and its thermal mechanical response characteristics of the cap and adjacent piles were compared and analyzed under the condition of with/without embedded depth. The results show that the heat transfer efficiency under the 3 m depth is 2.65 kW, which is about 68% higher than that of no embedded depth in this field test condition, reflecting the existence of a certain heat retention capacity of the overlying backfill. Under the condition of with/without embedded depth, the maximum thermal stress of the pile body appears in the middle of the pile body and the pile top respectively, which are 1.66 MPa and 2.14 MPa. During the heating process, the pile tip resistance increases first and then gradually decreases to a stable value. After heating for 24 h, it reaches a maximum value of about 20 kPa, which is consistent with the change trend of the inlet/outlet temperature difference. Under the condition of with/without embedded depth, the cap shows slightly different deformations in the heating conditions, and certain consideration should be given to the design of the energy pile structure with the cap. The maximum thermally induced stress values of the cap with/without embedded depth are 0.65 MPa and 2.34 MPa respectively, and the corresponding maximum temperature rise is 3.6 ℃ and 11.0 ℃.

参考文献/References:

[1] 余 闯,潘林有,刘松玉,等.热交换桩的作用机制及其应用[J].岩土力学,2009,30(4):933-937,948.
YU Chuang,PAN Lin-you,LIU Song-yu,et al.Working Mechanism and Application of Heat Exchanger Piles[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2009,30(4):933-937,948.
[2]刘汉龙,孔纲强,吴宏伟.能量桩工程应用研究进展及PCC能量桩技术开发[J].岩土工程学报,2014,36(1):176-181.
LIU Han-long,KONG Gang-qiang,WU Hong-wei.Applications of Energy Piles and Technical Development of PCC Energy Piles[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2014,36(1):176-181.
[3]钱七虎.利用地下空间助力发展绿色建筑与绿色城市[J].隧道建设:中英文,2019,39(11):1737-1747.
QIAN Qi-hu.Underground Space Utilization Helps Develop Green Buildings and Green Cities[J].Tunnel Construction,2019,39(11):1737-1747.
[4]党 政,关 文,程晓辉,等.CFG能源桩用于混凝土路面除冰降温的试验研究[J].中国公路学报,2019,32(2):19-30.
DANG Zheng,GUAN Wen,CHENG Xiao-hui,et al.Experimental Study on CFG Energy Pile for Concrete Pavement Deicing and Cooling[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2019,32(2):19-30.
[5]KONG G Q,WU D,LIU H L,et al.Performance of a Geothermal Energy Deicing System for Bridge Deck Using a Pile Heat Exchanger[J].International Journal of Energy Research,2019,43(1):596-603.
[6]PARK S,LEE D,LEE S,et al.Experimental and Numerical Analysis on Thermal Performance of Large-diameter Cast-in-place Energy Pile Constructed in Soft Ground[J].Energy,2017,118(1):297-311.
[7]MURPHY K D,MCCARTNEY J S,HENRY K S.Evaluation of Thermo-mechanical and Thermal Behavior of Full-scale Energy Foundations[J].Acta Ge-otechnica,2015,10(2):179-195.
[8]CHEN Y H,XU J,LI H,et al.Performance of a Prestressed Concrete Pipe Energy Pile During Heating and Cooling[J].Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities,2017,31(3):06017001
[9]桂树强,程晓辉.能源桩换热过程中结构响应原位试验研究[J].岩土工程学报,2014,36(6):1087-1094.
GUI Shu-qiang,CHENG Xiao-hui.In-situ Tests on Structural Responses of Energy Piles During Heat Exchanging Process[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2014,36(6):1087-1094.
[10]路宏伟,蒋 刚,王 昊,等.摩擦型能源桩荷载-温度现场联合测试与承载性状分析[J].岩土工程学报,2017,39(2):334-342.
LU Hong-wei,JIANG Gang,WANG Hao,et al.In-situ Tests and Thermo-mechanical Bearing Characteristics of Friction Geothermal Energy Piles[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2017,39(2):334-342.
[11]费 康,朱志慧,石雨恒,等.能量桩群桩工作特性简化分析方法研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(12):3889-3898.
FEI Kang,ZHU Zhi-hui,SHI Yu-heng,et al.A Simplified Method for Geotechnical Analysis of Energy Pile Groups[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2020,41(12):3889-3898.
[12]REN L W,XU J,KONG G Q,et al.Field Tests on Thermal Response Characteristics of Micro-steel-pipe Pile Under Multiple Temperature Cycles[J].Renewable Energy,2020,147:1098-1106.
[13]刘汉龙,黄 旭,孔纲强,等.桩芯介质对管式能量桩换热效率的影响[J].中国公路学报,2019,32(1):1-11.
LIU Han-long,HUANG Xu,KONG Gang-qiang,et al.Influence of Pile Core Medium on Heat Transfer Efficiency of Tubular Energy Pile[J].Chinese Journal of Highway and Transport,2019,32(1):1-11.
[14]FANG J C,KONG G Q,MENG Y D,et al.Thermomechanical Behavior of Energy Piles and Interactions Within Energy Pile-raft Foundations[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2020,146(9):04020079.
[15]方金城,孔纲强,孟永东,等.低承台2×2能量桩基础单桩运行热力耦合特性研究[J].岩土工程学报,2020,42(2):317-324.
FANG Jin-cheng,KONG Gang-qiang,MENG Yong-dong,et al.Thermal-mechanical Coupling Characteristics of Single Energy Pile Operation in 2×2 Pile-cap Foundation[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2020,42(2):317-324.
[16]李任融,孔纲强,杨 庆,等.流速对桩-筏基础中能量桩换热效率与热力耦合特性影响研究[J].岩土力学,2020,41(增1):264-270,298.
LI Ren-rong,KONG Gang-qiang,YANG Qing,et al.Study on Influence of Flow Velocity on Heat Transfer Efficiency and Thermal Coupling Characteristics of Energy Piles in Pile-raft Foundation[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2020,41(S1):264-270,298.
[17]BOURNE-WEBB P J,AMATYA B,SOGA K,et al.Energy Pile Test at Lambeth College,London:Geotechnical and Thermodynamic Aspects of Pile Response to Heat Cycles[J].Geotechnique,2009,59(3):237-248.
[18]LALOUI L,NUTH M,VULLIET L.Experimental and Numerical Investigations of the Behaviour of a Heat Exchanger Pile[J].International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2006,30(8):763-781.
[19]AMATYA B L,SOGA K,BOURNE-WEBB P J,et al.Thermo-mechanical Behaviour of Energy Piles[J].Geotechnique,2012,62(6):503-519.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-03-18
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51778212)
作者简介:陈 玉(1995-),男,湖北汉川人,工学博士研究生,E-mail:ctgu_chenyu@163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2021-09-01