«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:

41卷

期数:

2024年06期

页码:

182-190

栏目:

岩土工程

出版日期:

2024-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

Large strain nonlinear consolidation analysis of sand drain foundation considering smearing effect

文章编号:

1673-2049(2024)06-0182-09

作者:

陈 铭^1,2,曹文贵^1,2,崔鹏陆^1,2

(1. 湖南大学 土木工程学院,湖南 长沙 410082; 2. 湖南大学 建筑安全与节能教育部重点实验室,湖南 长沙 410082)

Author(s):

CHEN Ming^1,2, CAO Wengui^1,2, CUI Penglu^1,2

(1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Building Safety and Energy Efficiency, Ministry of Education, Hunan University, Changsha 410082, Hunan, China)

关键词:

砂井地基;  涂抹作用;  非线性压缩;  非达西渗流;  大应变;  固结度

Keywords:

sand drain foundation;  smearing effect;  nonlinear compression;  non-Darcy seepage;  large strain;  consolidation degree

分类号:

TU470

DOI:

10.19815/j.jace.2023.01008

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

假定土体中渗流符合非达西渗流,通过引入有效应力及渗透系数与孔隙比间的双对数模型描述软土非线性压缩特性,建立能同时考虑涂抹作用的砂井地基大变形固结模型,并用有限差分法对该模型求解。通过退化数值解与等应变条件下的解析解及现有试验的对比,验证了该解答的可靠性,并对影响砂井地基非线性固结的参数进行了分析。结果表明:在考虑涂抹作用的3种模式中,涂抹区渗透系数呈抛物线变化时固结最快,为常数时最慢; 相较于渗透系数为常数,涂抹区渗透系数线性变化时固结度最大相对偏差达到35.7%,沉降量最大相对偏差达到26.7%; 涂抹区渗透系数呈抛物线变化时固结度最大相对偏差达到36.9%,沉降量最大相对偏差达到28.4%; 双对数坐标系下的压缩指数和渗透指数增大,砂井地基固结速率减慢,压缩指数增大时最终沉降量增加,而渗透指数不影响最终沉降量,相较于压缩指数I_c=0.08,I_c=0.1时固结度最大相对偏差达到21.7%,最终沉降量偏差0.030 m; I_c=0.12时固结度最大相对偏差达到37.9%,沉降最大偏差达到0.059 m; 相较于渗透指数α=6,α=10时固结度最大相对偏差达到39.3%,α=14时高达61.9%; 考虑非达西渗流砂井地基固结速率更慢,固结度最大相对偏差可达16.5%。

Abstract:

Assuming that the seepage in the soil conformed to non-Darcy seepage, the nonlinear compression characteristics of soft soil were described by introducing a double logarithmic model between effective stress, permeability coefficient, and void ratio. A large deformation consolidation model for sand drain foundation that could simultaneously consider the smearing effect was established, and the model was solved using finite difference method. The reliability of the solution was verified by comparing the degenerate numerical solution with the analytical solution under equal strain conditions and existing experiments. The parameters that affect the nonlinear consolidation of sand drain foundation were analyzed. The results show that among the three modes of considering the smearing effect, the fastest consolidation occurs when the permeability coefficient of the smearing zone changes parabolically, and the slowest consolidation occurs when it is a constant. Compared to a constant permeability coefficient, when the permeability coefficient of the smearing zone changes linearly, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 35.7%, and the maximum relative deviation of settlement amount reaches 26.7%. When the permeability coefficient of the smearing zone changes in a parabolic pattern, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 36.9%, and the maximum relative deviation of settlement amount reaches 28.4%. As the compression index and permeability index in the double logarithmic coordinate system increase, the consolidation rate of the sand drain foundation slows down.When the compression index increases, the final settlement increases, while the permeability index does not affect the final settlement. Compared to the compression index I_c=0.08, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 21.7% when I_c=0.1, and the final settlement deviation is 0.030 m. When I_c=0.12, the maximum relative deviation of the consolidation degree reaches 37.9%, and the maximum deviation of settlement reaches 0.059 m. Compared to the permeability index α=6, the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree reaches 39.3% when α=10, and even reaches 61.9% when α=14. Considering non-Darcy seepage, the consolidation rate of sand drain foundation is slower, and the maximum relative deviation of consolidation degree can reach 16.5%.

参考文献/References:

[1] BASU D,BASU P,PREZZI M.Analytical solutions for consolidation aided by vertical drains[J].Geomechanics and Geoengineering,2006,1(1):63-71.
[2]WALKER R,INDRARATNA B.Vertical drain consolidation with parabolic distribution of permeability in smear zone[J].Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering,2006,132(7):937-941.
[3]DAVIS E H,RAYMOND G P.A non-linear theory of consolidation[J].Géotechnique,1965,15(2):161-173.
[4]XIE K H,LEO C J.Analytical solutions of one-dimensional large strain consolidation of saturated and homogeneous clays[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2004,31(4):301-314.
[5]HANSBO S.Aspects of vertical drain design:Darcian or non-Darcian flow[J].Géotechnique,1997,47(5):983-992.
[6]ONOUE A,TING N H,GERMAINE J T,et al.Permeability of disturbed zone around vertical drains[C]//ASCE.Proceedings of the ASCE Geotechnical Engineering Congress.Reston:ASCE,1991:879-890.
[7]WALKER R,INDRARATNA B.Vertical drain consolidation with overlapping smear zones[J].Géotechnique,2007,57(5):463-467.
[8]许 波,雷国辉,郑 强,等.考虑涂抹区压缩及渗透系数变化的堆载预压固结解[J].岩土力学,2014,35(6):1607-1616.
XU Bo,LEI Guohui,ZHENG Qiang,et al.Solution of consolidation by surcharge preloading considering compressibility and varying hydraulic conductivities in smear zone[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2014,35(6):1607-1616.
[9]蔡 新,谢康和,徐 妍,等.初始孔压非均布条件下涂抹区渗透系数变化的砂井地基固结解[J].岩土工程学报,2010,32(1):104-108.
CAI Xin,XIE Kanghe,XU Yan,et al.Analytical solution for consolidation of sand-drained ground under non-uniform distribution of initial excess pore water pressure and variation of permeability coefficient in smear zone[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2010,32(1):104-108.
[10]郭 彪,龚晓南,卢萌盟,等.土体水平渗透系数变化的多层砂井地基固结性状分析[J].工业建筑,2010,40(4):88-95.
GUO Biao,GONG Xiaonan,LU Mengmeng,et al.Consolidation behavior analysis of multi-layered sand drains foundation with varying horizontal permeability coefficient[J].Industrial Construction,2010,40(4):88-95.
[11]LU M M,WANG S Y,SLOAN S W,et al.Nonlinear radial consolidation of vertical drains under a general time-variable loading[J].International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2015,39(1):51-62.
[12]杨 鹏,蒲诃夫,郑俊杰,等.真空-堆载联合预压下竖井地基大变形非线性固结模型[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2019,38(10):2103-2111.
YANG Peng,PU Hefu,ZHENG Junjie,et al.A large-strain nonlinear consolidation model of saturated soft soils stabilized by the vacuum-surcharge combined preloading method[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2019,38(10):2103-2111.
[13]郭 霄,谢康和,卢萌盟,等.直排式真空预压法下竖井地基的非线性固结解析解[J].中南大学学报( 自然科学版),2018,49(2):384-392.
GUO Xiao,XIE Kanghe,LU Mengmeng,et al.Nonlinear analytical solution for consolidation of vertical drains by straight-line vacuum preloading method[J].Journal of Central South University(Science and Technology),2018,49(2):384-392.
[14]HANSBO S.Consolidation of clay with special reference to influence of vertical sand drains[C]// Swedish Geotechnical Institute.Proceedings of Swedish geotechnical institute.Stickholm:Swedish Geotechnical Institute,1960:45-50.
[15]MILLER R J,LOW P F.Threshold gradient for water flow in clay systems[J].Soil Science Society of America Journal,1963,27(6):605-609.
[16]CUI P L,CAO W G,XU Z,et al.One-dimensional non-linear rheological consolidation of clayey soils with Swartzendruber's flow law[J].Computers and Geotechnics,2023,155:105201.
[17]BUTTERFIELD R.A natural compression law for soils(an advance on e-log p')[J].Géotechnique,1979,29(4):469-480.
[18]李传勋,仇 超.高压缩性软土一维非线性大应变固结解析解[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2021,40(11):2344-2356.
LI Chuanxun,QIU Chao.An analytical solution for one-dimensional nonlinear large-strain consolidation of soft clay with high compressibility[J].Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering,2021,40(11):2344-2356.
[19]XIE K H,LU M M,LIU G B.Equal strain consolidation for stone columns reinforced foundation[J].International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2009,33(15):1721-1735.
[20]江文豪,詹良通.考虑井阻效应及径向渗透系数变化下砂井地基的大变形固结[J].岩土力学,2021,42(3):755-766.
JIANG Wenhao,ZHAN Liangtong.Large strain consolidation of sand-drained ground considering the well resistance and the variation of radial permeability coefficient[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2021,42(3):755-766.
[21]INDRARATNA B,RUJIKIATKAMJORN C,SATH ANANTHAN I.Radial consolidation of clay using compressibility indices and varying horizontal permeability[J].Canadian Geotechnical Journal,2005,42(5):1330-1341.
[22]谢康和,曾国熙.等应变条件下的砂井地基固结解析理论[J].岩土工程学报,1989,11(2):3-17.
XIE Kanghe,ZENG Guoxi.Consolidation theories for drain wells under equal strain condition[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,1989,11(2):3-17.
[23]李广信.高等土力学[M].北京:清华大学出版社,2004.
LI Guangxin.Advanced soil mechanics[M].Beijing:Tsinghua University Press,2004.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2023-11-07 投稿网址:http://jace.chd.edu.cn
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51879104,52078206)
通信作者:曹文贵(1963-),男,工学博士,教授,博士生导师,E-mail:cwglyp@hnu.edu.cn。
Author resume: CAO Wengui(1963-),male,PhD,professor,E-mail:cwglyp@hnu.edu.cn.

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2024-12-10