|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]骆维斌,乔 雄,倪伟淋,等.隧道新型装配式临时支撑结构研发及技术研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2022,39(05):262-273.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2022.03095]
 LUO Wei-bin,QIAO Xiong,NI Wei-lin,et al.Development and Technical Research of New Prefabricated Temporary Support Structure for Tunnel[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2022,39(05):262-273.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2022.03095]
点击复制

隧道新型装配式临时支撑结构研发及技术研究(PDF)
分享到:

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:
39卷
期数:
2022年05期
页码:
262-273
栏目:
基础工程
出版日期:
2022-09-30

文章信息/Info

Title:
Development and Technical Research of New Prefabricated Temporary Support Structure for Tunnel
文章编号:
1673-2049(2022)05-0262-12
作者:
骆维斌1,2,乔 雄3,倪伟淋3,刘文高3,田过勤1,2,黄锦聪3
(1. 甘肃路桥建设集团有限公司,甘肃 兰州 730030; 2. 甘肃省隧道工程技术研究中心,甘肃 兰州 730030; 3. 兰州理工大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730050)
Author(s):
LUO Wei-bin1,2, QIAO Xiong3, NI Wei-lin3, LIU Wen-gao3, TIAN Guo-qin1,2, HUANG Jin-cong3
(1. Gansu Road & Bridge Construction Group, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China; 2. Gansu Tunnel Engineering Technology Research Center, Lanzhou 730030, Gansu, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou University of Technology, Lanzhou 730050, Gansu, China)
关键词:
隧道施工 临时支撑 装配式结构 数值模拟
Keywords:
tunnel construction temporary support prefabricated structure numerical simulation
分类号:
TU94
DOI:
10.19815/j.jace.2022.03095
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
针对目前隧道传统临时支撑的不足,自主研发设计了一种全装配式竖直临时支撑结构,该结构采用预制装配式模块+现场拼装的方式进行施工。分别对该支护结构的横向支撑杆件及连接方式、挡土板及连接方式和顶部连接方式做了4种不同方案进行比选,最终分别采用水平板状横向支撑+插销式连接、挡板+T形插销式连接和顶部的螺栓连接。以桑园子隧道为背景,采用MIDAS/GTS数值模拟软件,对比分析了分部开挖施工中采用传统弧形支撑和新型竖直临时支撑的隧道围岩位移及支护结构力学特征,并结合现场实测数据对模拟结果进行验证。结果表明:从最终位移可以看出,两种临时支撑结构下拱顶和左、右边墙处围岩的变形近似相同,竖直临时支撑隧道围岩的拱顶以及左、右拱腰处的沉降相对弧形临时支撑较均匀,对隧道拱底变形的控制效果也更明显,且弧形临时支撑结构总变形量比竖直临时支撑大2.17倍; 对比力学特征可知,竖直临时支撑参与的受力效果较好,其最大压应力为弧形支撑的29.88倍,从而减少了隧道拱顶和拱底的应力; 对临时支撑24步开挖的变形进行分析得到,前20步开挖竖直临时支撑变形略大于弧形临时支撑,21步开始时弧形临时支撑变形迅速增大,导致施工段21~24步弧形临时支撑变形量均大于竖直临时支撑,说明竖直临时支撑结构自稳性更好,装配式临时支撑结构采用竖直形状更优,能满足隧道侧壁导坑法施工要求。
Abstract:
Aiming at the shortcomings of the current traditional temporary support of tunnels, a fully assembled vertical temporary support structure was independently developed and designed, which adopted the method of prefabricated modules + on-site assembly for construction. Four different schemes were compared and selected for the lateral support member and connection method, retaining plate and connection method, and top connection method of the supporting structure. Finally, horizontal plate lateral support + pin connection, baffle + T pin connection and bolt connection at the top were adopted respectively.Taking the Sangyuanzi tunnel as the background, the MIDAS/GTS numerical simulation software was used to compare and analyze the displacement of surrounding rock and the mechanical characteristics of the supporting structure of the tunnel using traditional arc support and new vertical temporary support in the part-step excavation construction. The measured data validated the simulation results. The results show that from the final displacement, it can be seen that the deformation of the vault under the two temporary support structures and the surrounding rock on the left and right walls are approximately the same. Compared with the arc temporary support, the settlement of the tunnel arch and the left and right arch waists with vertical temporary support is more uniform, and the control effect on the deformation of the tunnel arch bottom is also more obvious. The total deformation of the arc temporary support structure is 2.17 times larger than that of the vertical temporary support. Comparing the mechanical characteristics, it can be seen that the force effect of the vertical temporary support is better, and the maximum compressive stress is 29.88 times larger than that of the arc, thereby reducing the stress of the tunnel vault and vault bottom. Analysis of the displacement of the temporary support 24-step excavation shows that the vertical temporary support displacement of the first 20 steps of excavation is slightly larger than that of the arc temporary support. From step 21 to step 24, the displacement of the arc-shaped temporary support is larger than that of the vertical temporary support, indicating that the vertical temporary support structure has better self-stability, and the prefabricated temporary support structure adopts vertical shape is better, which can meet the construction requirements of the tunnel side heading method.

参考文献/References:

[1] 陈建勋,刘伟伟,陈丽俊,等.绿泥石片岩地层大跨度公路隧道大变形控制及合理支护形式现场试验[J].中国公路学报,2020,33(12):212-223.
CHEN Jian-xun,LIU Wei-wei,CHEN Li-jun,et al.In-situ Experimental Study on Large-deformation Control and Reasonable Support Forms for a Large-span Highway Tunnel in Chlorite Schist[J].China Journal of Highway and Transport,2020,33(12):212-223.
[2]陈培帅,王 伟,吴忠仕,等.浅埋大跨度黄土隧道变形特征及控制措施研究[J].现代隧道技术,2021,58(1):203-211.
CHEN Pei-shuai,WANG Wei,WU Zhong-shi,et al.Study on Deformation Characteristics and Control Measures of Shallow Large-span Loess Tunnels[J].Modern Tunnelling Technology,2021,58(1):203-211.
[3]梁 琨,王树欣,张宪堂,等.大跨度小净距隧道爆破振动响应研究[J].爆破,2021,38(2):67-72,159.
LIANG Kun,WANG Shu-xin,ZHANG Xian-tang,et al.Response of Large-span Tunnel to Blasting Vibration of Small Clear Spacing Tunnel Excavation[J].Blasting,2021,38(2):67-72,159.
[4]罗基伟,张顶立,房 倩,等.超大跨度隧道预应力锚杆-锚索协同支护机理[J].中国铁道科学,2020,41(5):71-82.
LUO Ji-wei,ZHANG Ding-li,FANG Qian,et al.Combined Support Mechanism of Pretensioned Rock Bolt and Anchor Cable for Super-large-span Tunnel[J].China Railway Science,2020,41(5):71-82.
[5]何发亮,王石春.铁路隧道围岩分级方法研究及发展[J].铁道工程学报,2005,22(增1):392-397.
HE Fa-liang,WANG Shi-chun.Research and Development on the Method of Rockmasses Classification in Railway Tunnel[J].Journal of Railway Engineering Society,2005,22(S1):392-397.
[6]王春雨,宋 昆.格罗皮乌斯与工业化住宅[J].河北建筑科技学院学报,2005,22(2):20-23.
WANG Chun-yu,SONG Kun.Gropius with Industrialized Building[J].Journal of Hebei Institute of Architectural Science and Technology,2005,22(2):20-23.
[7]刘惠敏.地下铁道明挖区间装配式衬砌力学特性研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2003.
LIU Hui-min.Study on the Mechanics Characters of the Fabricated Linings in the Subway Constructed by Open-cut Method[D].Chengdu:Southwest Jiaotong University,2003.
[8]王德超,王国富,乔 南,等.预制装配式结构在地下工程中的应用及前景分析[J].中国科技论文,2018,13(1):115-120.
WANG De-chao,WANG Guo-fu,QIAO Nan,et al.The Application and Prospect Analysis of Prefabricated Construction in Underground Engineering[J].China Sciencepaper,2018,13(1):115-120.
[9]周佳媚,高 波,李志业.TBM施工隧道仰拱预制块的力学特性研究[J].岩土力学,2004,25(12):1973-1976,1980.
ZHOU Jia-mei,GAO Bo,LI Zhi-ye.Study on Mechanical Characteristics of Precast Block of Inverted Arch for TBM Construction Tunnel[J].Rock and Soil Mechanics,2004,25(12):1973-1976,1980.
[10]周佳媚,李志业,高 波.TBM施工隧道仰拱预制块的受力分析[J].中国铁道科学,2004,25(3):32-35.
ZHOU Jia-mei,LI Zhi-ye,GAO Bo.Mechanic Analysis of Invert Prefabricate in TBM Construction Tunnel[J].China Railway Science,2004,25(3):32-35.
[11]章龙管,李志刚,路桂珍,等.大断面马蹄形盾构施工关键技术:以蒙华铁路白城隧道工程为例[J].隧道建设(中英文),2020,40(增1):297-306.
ZHANG Long-guan,LI Zhi-gang,LU Gui-zhen,et al.Key Construction Technology of Large Cross-section Horseshoe-shaped Shield:A Case Study on Baicheng Tunnel on Menghua Railway[J].Tunnel Construction,2020,40(S1):297-306.
[12]朱合华,黄伯麒,李晓军,等.盾构衬砌管片接头内力-变形统一模型及试验分析[J].岩土工程学报,2014,36(12):2153-2160.
ZHU He-hua,HUANG Bo-qi,LI Xiao-jun,et al.Unified Model for Internal Force and Deformation of Shield Segment Joints and Experimental Analysis[J].Chinese Journal of Geotechnical Engineering,2014,36(12):2153-2160.
[13]CHEN J S,MO H H.Mechanical Behavior of Segment Rebar of Shield Tunnel in Construction Stage[J].Journal of Zhejiang University-Science A(Applied Physics & Engineering),2008,9(7):888-899.
[14]杨秀仁.我国预制装配式地铁车站建造技术发展现状与展望[J].隧道建设(中英文),2021,41(11):1849-1870.
YANG Xiu-ren.Development Status of and Outlook for Construction Technology for Prefabricated Metro Stations in China[J].Tunnel Construction,2021,41(11):1849-1870.
[15]赵有明,王志伟,王子洪.铁路隧道预制装配式建造技术研究与展望[J].中国铁路,2020(12):51-60.
ZHAO You-ming,WANG Zhi-wei,WANG Zi-hong.Research and Prospect on Prefabricated Structure of Railway Tunnel[J].China Railway,2020(12):51-60.
[16]宋英杰.穿越高速公路超浅埋垂直叠落管廊隧道建造沉降机理及控制技术研究[D].北京:北京交通大学,2020.
SONG Ying-jie.Research on the Settlement Mechanism and Control Technology in the Construction of Ultra-shallow Buried Vertical Stacked Utility Tunnel Crossing Expressway[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2020.
[17]李 铁.大断面地铁隧道暗挖新工法的研究及应用[D].北京:北京交通大学,2018.
LI Tie.The Research and Application of New Excavation Method for Large Section Subway Tunnel[D].Beijing:Beijing Jiaotong University,2018.
[18]雷震宇,周顺华.浅埋大跨度隧道临时支撑的拆除分析[J].工程力学,2006,23(9):120-124.
LEI Zhen-yu,ZHOU Shun-hua.Analysis of Dismantling Temporary Support of Shallow-depth Large-span Tunnel[J].Engineering Mechanics,2006,23(9):120-124.
[19]周磊生,孙会彬,孔 军,等.CD和CRD法施工下超大断面隧道围岩变形控制数值计算研究[J].公路交通技术,2018,34(增1):66-69,75.
ZHOU Lei-sheng,SUN Hui-bin,KONG Jun,et al.Experimental Research Study on Surrounding Rock Control Mechanism of Super Large Section Tunnel Under CD and CRD Method[J].Technology of Highway and Transport,2018,34(S1):66-69,75.
[20]赵鹏社.关于大断面隧道施工CRD工法的优化[J].铁道建筑,2010,50(8):77-80.
ZHAO Peng-she.Optimization of CRD Construction Method for Large Section Tunnel Construction[J].Railway Engineering,2010,50(8):77-80.
[21]姚红伟,王 薇.浅埋暗挖隧道CRD工法优化与现场试验研究[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2018,15(6):1509-1515.
YAO Hong-wei,WANG Wei.Study of Optimal Proposal and Field Test for CRD Excavation Method of Shallow-buried Tunnel[J].Journal of Railway Science and Engineering,2018,15(6):1509-1515.
[22]杨 招,黄强兵,肖双全,等.地裂缝场地地铁隧道施工CRD工法优化研究[J].工程地质学报,2021,29(2):516-525.
YANG Zhao,HUANG Qiang-bing,XIAO Shuang-quan,et al.Study on Optimization of CRD Construction Method for Metro Tunnel Through Ground Fissure Site[J].Journal of Engineering Geology,2021,29(2):516-525.
[23]韩 赟,刘国庆,李世才,等.超前双导洞隧道开挖工法的研究与应用[J].现代隧道技术,2013,50(5):38-44.
HAN Yun,LIU Guo-qing,LI Shi-cai,et al.Study and Application of the Double Pilot Tunnel Construction Method[J].Modern Tunnelling Technology,2013,50(5):38-44.
[24]陈林杰,谭绪凯,艾振喜.泥岩地质条件下浅埋特大断面隧道施工方法优化研究[J].施工技术,2014,43(23):121-124.
CHEN Lin-jie,TAN Xu-kai,AI Zhen-xi.Study on Construction Technology Optimization of Shallow-buried Super-large Section Tunnel in the Mudstone Geology Condition[J].Construction Technology,2014,43(23):121-124.
[25]郭 杰.改进的双侧壁导坑法施工安全性分析[J].隧道建设,2014,34(6):525-533.
GUO Jie.Analysis on Construction Safety of Optimized Double Side Drift Method[J].Tunnel Construction,2014,34(6):525-533.
[26]李祥东,王 伟.地铁浅埋隧道双侧壁导坑法预留核心岩柱施工技术[J].隧道建设,2015,35(10):1060-1065.
LI Xiang-dong,WANG Wei.Case Study on Construction of Shallow Metro Tunnel by Double Side Heading Method with Core Rock Kept[J].Tunnel Construction,2015,35(10):1060-1065.
[27]尚友磊,谭 准.广州地铁流花路站超大断面暗挖工法优化[J].现代隧道技术,2019,56(3):177-185.
SHANG You-lei,TAN Zhun.Optimization of Mined Construction Method for the Super-large Section Liuhualu Station of Guangzhou Metro[J].Modern Tunnelling Technology,2019,56(3):177-185.
[28]卞正涛.新型连拱工法与双侧壁导坑法同条件应用对比分析[J].建筑技术,2021,52(8):937-941.
BIAN Zheng-tao.Comparison and Analysis on Applications of New Double-arch Construction Method and Double-side Heading Method Under Same Conditions[J].Architecture Technology,2021,52(8):937-941.

相似文献/References:

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2022-03-12
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51768041); 交通运输行业重点科技项目(2019-MS2-048)
作者简介:骆维斌(1980-),男,甘肃漳县人,高级工程师,工学硕士,E-mail:1130784037@qq.com。
通信作者:乔 雄(1980-),男,陕西榆林人,副教授,工学博士,E-mail:qiaoxiong@lut.edu.cn。
更新日期/Last Update: 2022-09-30