«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:

39卷

期数:

2022年06期

页码:

64-73

栏目:

结构工程

出版日期:

2022-11-30

文章信息/Info

Title:

Study on Force Mechanism and Numerical Simulation of Overall Stability of Stiffened Panel with Plate Rib

文章编号:

1673-2049(2022)06-0064-10

作者:

赵 秋¹,陈 鹏¹,林志平^2,3,张骏超⁴

(1. 福州大学 土木工程学院,福建 福州 350108; 2. 福建省高速技术咨询有限公司,福建 福州 350001; 3. 福建省高速公路工程重点实验室,福建 厦门 361001; 4. 福州市规划设计研究院集团有限公司,福建 福州 350108)

Author(s):

ZHAO Qiu¹, CHEN Peng¹, LIN Zhi-ping^2,3, ZHANG Jun-chao⁴

(1. College of Civil Engineering, Fuzhou University, Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China; 2. Fujian Provincial Expressway Technology Consulting Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350001, Fujian, China; 3. Fujian Provincial Key Laboratory of Expressway Engineering, Xiamen 361001, Fujian, China; 4. Fuzhou Planning & Design Research Insititute Group Co., Ltd., Fuzhou 350108, Fujian, China)

关键词:

板肋加劲板;  整体稳定;  数值模拟;  破坏模式;  应力-位移曲线;  受力机理

Keywords:

stiffened panel with plate rib;  overall stability;  numerical simulation;  failure mode;  stress-displacement curve;  force mechanism

分类号:

TU311

DOI:

10.19815/j.jace.2021.08087

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

分别采用梁单元与板壳单元建立同时考虑初始几何缺陷和焊接残余应力的受压板肋加劲板整体稳定分析有限元模型,并以相应试验结果进行验证,得到梁与板壳单元模拟受压板肋加劲板整体稳定的异同。采用经验证的数值模拟方法,对不同弯曲失稳方向板肋加劲板的受力机理进行了研究。结果表明:采用板壳单元可以较好还原板肋加劲板整体稳定受力性能,板壳有限元模型与试验试件的承载力最大相对误差为4.2%,平均相对误差为1.48%; 梁单元模型与长(中长)柱试验试件的承载力最大相对误差为5.4%,平均相对误差为1.92%,与短柱试件的承载力相对误差虽仅为0.7%,但由于不能考虑板件发生的塑性失稳,其应力-位移曲线拟合情况相对较差; 不同弯曲失稳方向板肋加劲板整体稳定构件的破坏特征不同,其中对于板肋侧弯曲的板肋加劲板整体稳定构件,被加劲板边缘部分受压达到材料屈服强度且板肋边缘受拉达到屈服强度时,构件整体达到其承载极限; 对于被加劲板侧弯曲的板肋加劲板整体稳定构件,当板肋边缘部分受压达到材料屈服强度时,构件整体达到其承载极限; 对于实际工程中组成钢箱梁顶板的板肋加劲板,制作时应避免朝向板肋侧的变形。

Abstract:

The finite element model for the overall stability analysis of the stiffened panel with plate rib under compression was established by using beam element and shell element respectively. The initial geometric defects and welding residual stress were considered and verified by the corresponding test results, and then the overall stability simulation difference of the stiffened panel with plate rib under compression between the beam and shell element was obtained. Using the verified numerical simulation method, the force mechanism of stiffened panel with plate rib in different bending instability directions was studied. The results show that the shell element can better restore the overall stability of the stiffened panel with plate rib. The maximum relative error between the shell finite element model and the test specimen is 4.2%, and the average relative error is 1.48%. The maximum bearing capacity relative error between the beam element model and the long(medium long)column test specimen is 5.4%, the average relative error is 1.92%. Although the bearing capacity relative error between the beam element model and the short column test specimen is only 0.7%, the fitting of the stress-displacement curve is relatively poor because the plastic instability of the plate can not be considered. The failure characteristics for the overall stability of stiffened panels with different bending instability directions are different. For the overall stable members of stiffened panel with bending on the side of the plate rib, when the edge of the stiffened panel is pressed to the material yield strength and the edge of the plate rib is pulled to the yield strength, the whole member reaches its bearing limit. For the overall stable member bending on the side of the stiffened panel, when the edge of the stiffened panel reaches the material yield strength, the whole member reaches its bearing limit. For the stiffened panel with ribs constituting the top plate of steel box girder in practical engineering, the deformation towards the side of plate ribs should be avoided in fabrication.

参考文献/References:

[1] 赵 秋,翟战胜.开口肋加劲板屈曲模态与临界屈曲应力分析[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2016,33(2):48-55.
ZHAO Qiu,ZHAI Zhan-sheng.Analysis of Buckling Modes and Critical Buckling Stress of Open-rib Stiffened Plate[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2016,33(2):48-55.
[2]SHI G,XU K L,BAN H Y,et al.Local Buckling Behavior of Welded Stub Columns with Normal and High Strength Steels[J].Journal of Constructional Steel Research,2016,119:144-153.
[3]方淑君,戴公连.钢箱梁受压翼缘局部稳定分析[J].长沙铁道学院学报,2003(2):29-31,44.
FANG Shu-jun,DAI Gong-lian.The Local Stability Analysis of Steel Box Girder[J].Journal of Changsha Railway University,2003(2):29-31,44.
[4]赵 秋,张骏超,林 楚,等.混合钢U肋加劲板受压整体稳定承载力数值模拟与计算方法[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2020,37(3):45-54.
ZHAO Qiu,ZHANG Jun-chao,LIN Chu,et al.Numerical Simulation and Calculation Method of Hybrid Steel U-rib Stiffened Plate's Compression Overall Stability Bearing Capacity[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2020,37(3):45-54.
[5]邵旭东,张 欣,李立峰.开口加劲板稳定极限承载力分析[J].公路,2005(7):1-4.
SHAO Xu-dong,ZHANG Xin,LI Li-feng.Stability Analysis of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Open Stiffened Plates[J].Highway,2005(7):1-4.
[6]翁雅谷,肖维思,刘玉擎.高强度钢加劲板轴压承载性能研究[J].钢结构,2016,31(11):42-46.
WENG Ya-gu,XIAO Wei-si,LIU Yu-qing.Research on the Bearing Capacity of High Strength Steel Stiffened Plates Under Axial Compression[J].Steel Construction,2016,31(11):42-46.
[7]王欣南,徐莲净.受压开口肋加劲板稳定承载力数值模拟[J].中外公路,2014,34(6):168-170.
WANG Xin-nan,XU Lian-jing.Numerical Simulation of Stable Bearing Capacity of Stiffened Plates with Open Ribs Under Compression[J].Journal of China & Foreign Highway,2014,34(6):168-170.
[8]SADAMOTO S,TANAKA S,TANIGUCHI K,et al.Buckling Analysis of Stiffened Plate Structures by an Improved Meshfree Flat Shell Formulation[J].Thin-walled Structures,2017,117:303-313.
[9]赵 秋,郭智勇,董 锐,等.热-物理与力学参量对混合钢U肋加劲板残余应力分布影响[J].焊接学报,2016,37(3):28-32,130.
ZHAO Qiu,GUO Zhi-yong,DONG Rui,et al.Effect of Thermophysical and Mechanical Parameters on Welding Residual Stress of Hybrid Steel U-rib Stiffened Plate[J].Transactions of the China Welding Institution,2016,37(3):28-32,130.
[10]ZHAO Q,ZHAI Z S,NIE Y.Distribution of Welding Residual Stress of Mixed Steel U-rib-stiffened Plates[J].Transactions of Tianjin University,2018,24(5):489-500.
[11]李国强,王彦博,陈素文,等.Q460高强钢焊接箱形柱轴心受压极限承载力参数分析[J].建筑结构学报,2011,32(11):149-155.
LI Guo-qiang,WANG Yan-bo,CHEN Su-wen,et al.Parametric Analysis of Ultimate Bearing Capacity of Q460 High Strength Steel Welded Box Columns Under Axial Compression[J].Journal of Building Structures,2011,32(11):149-155.
[12]陈建桂.开口肋加劲板焊接残余应力试验与数值模拟研究[D].福州:福州大学,2018.
CHEN Jian-gui.Experimental and Numerical Simulation Study of Welding Residual Stress in Stiffened Plate with Open Ribs[D].Fuzhou:Fuzhou University,2018.
[13]郭小农.铝合金结构构件理论和试验研究[D].上海:同济大学,2006.
GUO Xiao-nong.Theoretical and Experimental Research on the Aluminum Alloy Structure Members[D].Shanghai:Tongji University,2006.
[14]公路钢结构桥梁设计规范:JTG D64—2015[S].北京:人民交通出版社,2015.
Specifications for Design of Highway Steel Bridge:JTG D64—2015[S].Beijing:China Communications Press,2015.

相似文献/References:

[1]张军锋,葛耀君,赵林.双曲冷却塔结构规范静风稳定对比[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2011,28(03):62.
　ZHANG Jun-feng,GE Yao-jun,ZHAO Lin.Comparison of Aerostatic Stability of Hyperboloidal Cooling Tower Structures in Different Codes[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2011,28(06):62.
[2]赵 秋,张骏超,林 楚,等.混合钢U肋加劲板受压整体稳定承载力数值模拟与计算方法[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2020,37(03):45.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2019.04034]
　ZHAO Qiu,ZHANG Jun-chao,LIN Chu,et al.Numerical Simulation and Calculation Method of Hybrid Steel U-rib Stiffened Plate's Compression Overall Stability Bearing Capacity[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2020,37(06):45.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2019.04034]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-08-21
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51478120); 福建省自然科学基金项目(2019J01232)
作者简介:赵 秋(1976-),男,吉林通榆人,教授,博士研究生导师,工学博士,E-mail:zhaoqiu@fzu.edu.cn。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2022-12-20