«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:

40卷

期数:

2023年03期

页码:

20-29

栏目:

建筑材料

出版日期:

2023-05-20

文章信息/Info

Title:

Life cycle assessment on CO₂ emission for biochar concrete

文章编号:

1673-2049(2023)03-0020-10

作者:

吴 维^1,2,卢玉南^1,3,覃英宏^1,2,3,谢金利^1,2,谭康豪^1,2

(1. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,广西 南宁 530004; 2. 广西大学 工程防灾与结构安全教育部重点实验室,广西 南宁 530004; 3. 广西华蓝岩土工程有限公司,广西 南宁 530001)

Author(s):

WU Wei^1,2, LU Yunan^1,3, QIN Yinghong^1,2,3, XIE Jinli^1,2, TAN Kanghao^1,2

(1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Disaster Prevention and Structural Safety of Ministry of Education, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, Guangxi, China; 3. Guangxi Hualan Geotechnical Engineering Limited Company, Nanning 530001, Guangxi, China)

关键词:

生物炭混凝土;  生命周期;  CO₂排放量;  农林废弃生物质

Keywords:

biochar concrete;  life cycle;  CO₂ emission;  agriculture and forestry biomass

分类号:

TU528.01

DOI:

10.19815/j.jace.2021.11046

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

为评价生物炭混凝土的CO₂排放量,采用生命周期评价技术构建了生物质热解生产生物炭过程的碳排放计算模型、生物炭混凝土从原材料生产到混凝土拆除废弃阶段CO₂排放量化模型和生物炭混凝土服役期碳化-吸收模型,同时研究了生物炭按质量比例取代水泥对混凝土力学性能的影响。在此基础上,计算了1 m³C30生物炭混凝土的CO₂排放量,并与普通C30混凝土CO₂排放量进行对比。结果表明:生物炭作为一种碳负性材料,其碳元素含量越高,CO₂减排效果越好; 当生物炭取代率小于5.0%时,研磨后的超细炭颗粒可以充分发挥填充和内固化效应,有效地提高混凝土的力学性能; 生物炭混凝土生命周期CO₂排放量随生物炭取代率的提高而降低,5%取代率的1 m³木屑生物炭混凝土相比普通C30混凝土,可减排CO₂66.5 kg,减排率为20.7%; 生物炭混凝土在服役期内因碳化吸收CO₂占总碳排放量的1.8%～2.5%,而拆除废弃阶段由于混凝土的比表面积呈指数增长,碳化吸收量需要进一步研究。

Abstract:

To evaluate the CO₂ emissions of biochar concrete, life cycle assessment technology was used to construct a carbon emission calculation model for the production of biochar by biomass pyrolysis, a CO₂ emission model for biochar concrete from raw material production to concrete demolition and abandonment, and a carbonation-absorption model for biochar concrete during service period. Meanwhile, the effect of biochar replacing cement in mass ratio on the mechanical properties of concrete was studied. On this basis, the CO₂ emission for 1 m³ C30 biochar concrete were calculated and compared with that of ordinary C30 concrete. The results show that biochar is a carbon negative material and the higher carbon content, the better the CO₂ reduction effect. When the replacement rate of biochar is less than 5.0%, the ultrafine carbon particles after grinding can give full play to the filling and internal curing effects and effectively improve the mechanical properties of concrete. The life-cycle CO₂ emission of biochar concrete decreases with the increase of biochar replacement rate. Compared with ordinary C30 concrete, the CO₂ emission of 1 m³ wood biochar concrete with 5% replacement rate can reduce 66.5 kg CO₂ emissions with a reduction rate of 20.7%. During the service period of biochar concrete, the absorption of CO₂ by carbonation accounts for 1.8%-2.5% of the total carbon emissions. However, due to the exponential growth of the specific surface area of concrete in the demolition and abandonment stage, the amount of carbonation absorption needs further study.

参考文献/References:

[1] ANDRES R J,MARLAND G,BODEN T,et al.Carbon dioxide emissions from fossil fuel consumption and cement manufacture[R].Jonesboro:Arkanasas State Universtity,1994.
[2]齐冬有,张 标,罗 宁.水泥工业碳减排的技术路径[EB/OL].(2021-06-08)[2023-03-29].https://www.ccement.com/news/content/13050268544005001.html.
QI Dongyou,ZHANG Biao,LUO Ning.Technical path for carbon emission reduction in cement industry[EB/OL].(2021-06-08)[2023-03-29].https://www.ccement.com/news/content/13050268544005001.html.
[3]马忠诚,汪 澜.水泥工业CO₂减排及利用技术进展[J].材料导报,2011,25(19):150-154.
MA Zhongcheng,WANG Lan.Technical progress of emission-reduction and utilization of carbon dioxide in cement industry[J].Materials Review,2011,25(19):150-154.
[4]ENVIRONMENT U N,SCRIVENER K L,JOHN V M,et al.Eco-efficient cements:potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO₂ cement-based materials industry[J].Cement and Concrete Research,2018,114:2-26.
[5]HIGUCHI T,MORIOKA M,YOSHIOKA I,et al.Development of a new ecological concrete with CO₂ emissions below zero[J].Construction and Building Materials,2014,67:338-343.
[6]李金文,顾 凯,唐朝生,等.生物炭对土体物理化学性质影响的研究进展[J].浙江大学学报(工学版),2018,52(1):192-206.
LI Jin-wen,GU Kai,TANG Chao-sheng,et al.Advances in effects of biochar on physical and chemical properties of soils[J].Journal of Zhejiang University(Engineering Science),2018,52(1):192-206.
[7]张伟明.生物炭的理化性质及其在作物生产上的应用[D].沈阳:沈阳农业大学,2012.
ZHANG Weiming.Physical and chemical properties of biochar and its application in crop production[D].Shenyang:Shenyang Agricultural University,2012.
[8]AKHTAR A,SARMAH A K.Novel biochar-concrete composites:manufacturing,characterization and evaluation of the mechanical properties[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,616-617:408-416.
[9]GUPTA S,KUA H W.Factors determining the potential of biochar as a carbon capturing and sequestering construction material:critical review[J].Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering,2017,29(9):04017086.
[10]GUPTA S,KUA H W,KOH H J.Application of biochar from food and wood waste as green admixture for cement mortar[J].Science of the Total Environment,2018,619-620:419-435.
[11]PRANEETH S,GUO R,WANG T,et al.Accelerated carbonation of biochar reinforced cement-fly ash composites:enhancing and sequestering CO₂ in building materials[J].Construction and Building Materials,2020,244:118363.
[12]姜志翔,郑 浩,李锋民,等.生物炭技术缓解我国温室效应潜力初步评估[J].环境科学,2013,34(6):2486-2492.
JIANG Zhixiang,ZHENG Hao,LI Fengmin,et al.Preliminary assessment of the potential of biochar technology in mitigating the greenhouse effect in China[J].Environmental Science,2013,34(6):2486-2492.
[13]Environmental management — life cycle assessment — principles and framework:ISO 14040:2006[S].Geneva:IOS,2006.
[14]LIU Z,GUAN D B,WEI W,et al.Reduced carbon emission estimates from fossil fuel combustion and cement production in China[J].Nature,2015,524(7565):335-338.
[15]建筑碳排放计算标准:GB/T 51366-2019[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2019.
Standard for building carbon emission calculation:GB/T 51366-2019[S].Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2019.
[16]LAIRD D A,BROWN R C,AMONETTE J E,et al.Review of the pyrolysis platform for coproducing bio-oil and biochar[J].Biofuels,Bioproducts and Biorefining,2009,3(5):547-562.
[17]SHACKLEY S,HAMMOND J,GAUNT J,et al.The feasibility and costs of biochar deployment in the UK[J].Carbon Management,2011,2(3):335-356.
[18]GAUNT J L,LEHMANN J.Energy balance and emissions associated with biochar sequestration and pyrolysis bioenergy production[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2008,42(11):4152-4158.
[19]狄向华,聂祚仁,左铁镛.中国火力发电燃料消耗的生命周期排放清单[J].中国环境科学,2005,25(5):632-635.
DI Xianghua,NIE Zuoren,ZUO Tieyong.Life cycle emission inventories for the fuels consumed by thermal power in China[J].China Environmental Science,2005,25(5):632-635.
[20]WEBER K,QUICKER P.Properties of biochar[J].Fuel,2018,217:240-261.
[21]ROBERTS K G,GLOY B A,JOSEPH S,et al.Life cycle assessment of biochar systems:estimating the energetic,economic,and climate change potential[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2010,44(2):827-833.
[22]刘俊伟,田秉晖,张培栋,等.秸秆直燃发电系统的生命周期评价[J].可再生能源,2009,27(5):102-106.
LIU Junwei,TIAN Binghui,ZHANG Peidong,et al.Life cycle assessment on straw directly combustion for power generation system[J].Renewable Energy Resources,2009,27(5):102-106.
[23]肖建庄,黎 骜,丁 陶.再生混凝土生命周期CO₂排放评价[J].东南大学学报(自然科学版),2016,46(5):1088-1092.
XIAO Jianzhuang,LI Ao,DING Tao.Life cycle assessment on CO₂ emission for recycled aggregate concrete[J].Journal of Southeast University(Natural Science Edition),2016,46(5):1088-1092.
[24]李小冬,王 帅,孔祥勤,等.预拌混凝土生命周期环境影响评价[J].土木工程学报,2011,44(1):132-138.
LI Xiaodong,WANG Shuai,KONG Xiangqin,et al.Life cycle assessment of environmental impacts of ready-mixed concrete[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2011,44(1):132-138.
[25]颜小波,师海霞,张 晋,等.2019年全国预拌混凝土绿色示范工厂评选结果分析[J].混凝土世界,2020(4):33-35.
YAN Xiaobo,SHI Haixia,ZHANG Jin,et al.Analysis on the selection result of national ready-mixed concrete green demonstration plant in 2019[J].China Concrete,2020(4):33-35.
[26]GONG X Z,NIE Z R,WANG Z H,et al.Life cycle energy consumption and carbon dioxide emission of residential building designs in Beijing[J].Journal of Industrial Ecology,2012,16(4):576-587.
[27]PADE C,GUIMARAES M.The CO₂ uptake of concrete in a 100 year perspective[J].Cement and Concrete Research,2007,37(9):1348-1356.
[28]ANDERSSON R,FRIDH K,STRIPPLE H,et al.Calculating CO₂ uptake for existing concrete structures during and after service life[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2013,47(20):11625-11633.
[29]GALAN I,ANDRADE C,MORA P,et al.Sequestration of CO₂ by concrete carbonation[J].Environmental Science & Technology,2010,44(8):3181-3186.
[30]WORRELL E,PRICE L,MARTIN N,et al.Carbon dioxide emissions from the global cement industry[J].Annual Review of Energy and the Environment,2001,26:303-329.
[31]LEE S H,PARK W J,LEE H S.Life cycle CO₂ assessment method for concrete using CO₂ balance and suggestion to decrease LCCO₂ of concrete in South-Korean apartment[J].Energy and Buildings,2013,58:93-102.
[32]TAN K H,PANG X J,QIN Y H,et al.Properties of cement mortar containing pulverized biochar pyrolyzed at different temperatures[J].Construction and Building Materials,2020,263:120616.
[33]KHUSHNOOD R A,AHMAD S,RESTUCCIA L,et al.Carbonized nano/microparticles for enhanced mechanical properties and electromagnetic interference shielding of cementitious materials[J].Frontiers of Structural and Civil Engineering,2016,10(2):209-213.
[34]GUPTA S,KUA H W,PANG S D.Biochar-mortar composite:manufacturing,evaluation of physical properties and economic viability[J].Construction and Building Materials,2018,167:874-889.
[35]张 誉,蒋利学.基于碳化机理的混凝土碳化深度实用数学模型[J].工业建筑,1998,28(1):16-19,47.
ZHANG Yu,JIANG Lixue.A practical mathematical model of concrete carbonation depth based on the mechanism[J].Industrial Construction,1998,28(1):16-19,47.
[36]KJELLSEN K O,GUIMARAES M,NILSSON A.The CO₂ balance of concrete in a life cycle perspective[R].Taastrup:DTI,2005.

相似文献/References:

[1]肖建庄,陈立浩,叶建军,等.混凝土结构拆除技术与绿色化发展[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2019,36(05):1.
　XIAO Jian-zhuang,CHEN Li-hao,YE Jian-jun,et al.Technology and Green Development of Demolition for Concrete Structures[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2019,36(03):1.
[2]史艳莉,张文旭,贾志路,等.内配型钢矩形钢管混凝土轴压短柱生命周期内的力学性能[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2020,37(03):81.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2019.05053]
　SHI Yan-li,ZHANG Wen-xu,JIA Zhi-lu,et al.Mechanical Behavior of Rectangular Concrete-filled Steel Tubular Stub Columns with Encased Profiled Steel Subjected to Axial Load in Life Cycle[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2020,37(03):81.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2019.05053]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2021-11-12
基金项目:广西高等学校高水平创新团队及卓越学者计划项目(2019); 广西研究生教育创新计划资助项目(YCBZ2021022)
作者简介:吴 维(1993-),男,工学硕士,E-mail:wuweia403@163.com。
通信作者:谭康豪(1990-),男,工学博士,助理教授,E-mail:haokangtan@163.com。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2023-05-20