|Table of Contents|

Calculation of safety thickness of underlying filling karst cave roof of bridge pile foundation(PDF)

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

Issue:
2025年04期
Page:
177-186
Research Field:
岩土工程
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Calculation of safety thickness of underlying filling karst cave roof of bridge pile foundation
Author(s):
WANG Chengcheng ZHANG Shasha YANG Xiaohua LI Jifu
(School of Highway, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710064, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
underlying karst cave safety thickness bridge pile foundation orthogonal test multiple regression analysis
PACS:
TU921
DOI:
10.19815/j.jace.2023.05063
Abstract:
When the pile foundation of bridges in mountainous areas has underlying karst cave, the pile foundation should maintain a certain safe thickness with the karst cave to ensure the stability of the pile foundation and bridge. Combined with theoretical analysis and numerical test, the safety thickness of underlying karst cave roof of pile foundation was calculated, and the karst cave roof was simplified into solid supported beam, simple supported beam and cantilever beam respectively. By using FLAC3D software and orthogonal experimental design method, the influence rules and significance of surrounding rock level, karst cave span, height-to-span ratio, pile diameter and rock-socking depth on roof safety thickness were analyzed, and the prediction model of minimum safe roof thickness of underlying karst cave of bridge pile foundation was established. The results show that the safety thickness of underlying karst cave roof of pile foundation is directly proportional to the level of surrounding rock and karst cave span, and inversely proportional to the height-to-span ratio. With the increase of rock-socking depth, the safety thickness of karst cave roof increases first and then decreases, and the influence of pile diameter is not obvious. The overall influence degree from large to small is karst cave span, rock-socking depth, surrounding rock level, pile diameter, height-to-span ratio, and the weight of each factor are 0.679, 0.140, 0.044, 0.018, 0.011, respectively. The test results of engineering cases show that the safety thickness predicted by theoretical analysis is basically consistent with the results of numerical analysis, and the prediction of safety thickness based on mechanical model is conservative, and compared with the mechanical model prediction result, the prediction of safety thickness of two engineering examples by numerical simulation test is reduced by 1.47 m and 0.59 m, respectively. Moreover, the numerical analysis method is feasible when applied to different geological conditions and has certain accuracy and representativeness.

References:

[1] 汪 婧.基于上限分析原理的岩溶桩基破坏模式与极限承载力计算[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2019,16(9):2207-2214.
WANG Jing. Failure mode and ultimate bearing capacity of karst pile foundation based on upper-bound theorem[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2019, 16(9): 2207-2214.
[2]杨晓华,李爱明,李吉富.山区既有公路桥梁桩基下伏溶洞处治技术[J].公路,2020,65(10):100-106.
YANG Xiaohua, LI Aiming, LI Jifu. Treatment technology for underlying caves of pile foundation of highway bridges in mountainous areas[J]. Highway, 2020, 65(10): 100-106.
[3]赵明华,雷 勇,张 锐.岩溶区桩基冲切破坏模式及安全厚度研究[J].岩土力学,2012,33(2):524-530.
ZHAO Minghua, LEI Yong, ZHANG Rui. Study of punching failure mode and safe thickness of pile foundation in karst region[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2012, 33(2): 524-530.
[4]唐明裴,王如寒,宁平华.基于双液高压旋喷注浆处理后桩基持力层安全厚度分析[J].北京交通大学学报,2020,44(1):129-134.
TANG Mingpei, WANG Ruhan, NING Pinghua. Safety thickness analysis of pile foundation bearing stratum after high-pressure jet grouting of cement-water glass[J]. Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University, 2020, 44(1): 129-134.
[5]柏华军.考虑溶洞顶板自重时桩端持力岩层安全厚度计算方法[J].岩土力学,2016,37(10):2945-2952.
BAI Huajun. A method for calculating the safety rock thickness of pile bearing strata with considering deadweight of karst cave roof[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2016, 37(10): 2945-2952.
[6]贺建清,喻畅英,肖 兰,等.基于上限定理确定岩溶区桩端极限承载力及其下伏溶洞顶板安全厚度[J].自然灾害学报,2017,26(2):47-52.
HE Jianqing, YU Changying, XIAO Lan, et al. Determination of ultimate bearing capacity of pile tip and safety thickness of cave roofs under pile tip in karst area based on upper bound theorem[J]. Journal of Natural Disasters, 2017, 26(2): 47-52.
[7]赵瑞峰,赵跃平,王亨林,等.溶洞顶板安全厚度估算[J].工业建筑,2009,39(增1):800-803.
ZHAO Ruifeng, ZHAO Yueping, WANG Henglin, et al. Estimation of safe thickness of karst cave roof[J]. Industrial Construction, 2009, 39(S1): 800-803.
[8]张建华.基于突变理论的岩溶区路基顶板安全厚度分析[J].铁道科学与工程学报,2009,6(3):52-55.
ZHANG Jianhua. Analysis of cave roof safe thickness in karst region based on catastrophe theory[J]. Journal of Railway Science and Engineering, 2009, 6(3): 52-55.
[9]张永杰,邓俊强,杨兴山,等.考虑溶洞空间形态的岩溶桩基稳定性分析方法[J].中国公路学报,2019,32(1):37-45.
ZHANG Yongjie, DENG Junqiang, YANG Xing-shan, et al. Stability analysis method of pile foundation in karst area base on cavern spatial form[J]. China Journal of Highway and Transport, 2019, 32(1): 37-45.
[10]JIANG C, LIU L, WU J P. A new method determining safe thickness of karst cave roof under pile tip[J]. Journal of Central South University, 2014, 21(3): 1190-1196.
[11]梁冠亭,肖开乾,郑宏伟,等.基于尖点突变理论的岩溶区嵌岩桩溶洞顶板安全厚度研究[J].水文地质工程地质,2018,45(5):67-72.
LIANG Guanting, XIAO Kaiqian, ZHENG Hongwei, et al.A study of the safety thickness of cave roof under rock-socketed pile in karst area based on the cusp catastrophe theory[J]. Hydrogeology & Engineering Geology, 2018, 45(5): 67-72.
[12]黄 明,付俊杰,陈福全,等.桩端荷载与地震耦合作用下溶洞顶板的破坏特征及安全厚度计算[J].岩土力学,2017,38(11):3154-3162.
HUANG Ming, FU Junjie, CHEN Fuquan, et al. Damage characteristics of karst cave roof and its safety thickness calculation under the coupling effect of pile-tip load and seismic wave[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2017, 38(11): 3154-3162.
[13]马 郧,李 松,朱 佳,等.确定嵌岩桩下伏溶洞顶板安全厚度的局部强度折减法[J].铁道建筑,2017,57(10):109-112.
MA Yun, LI Song, ZHU Jia, et al. Local strength reduction method for determining safe thickness of karst cave roof under rock socketed pile[J]. Railway Engineering, 2017, 57(10): 109-112.
[14]汪华斌,刘志峰,赵文锋,等.桥梁桩基荷载下溶洞顶板稳定性研究[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2013,32(增2):3655-3662.
WANG Huabin, LIU Zhifeng, ZHAO Wenfeng, et al. Study on stability of karst cave roof under bridge pile foundation load[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2013, 32(S2): 3655-3662.
[15]王 勇,乔春生,孙彩红,等.基于SVM的溶洞顶板安全厚度智能预测模型[J].岩土力学,2006,27(6):1000-1004.
WANG Yong, QIAO Chunsheng, SUN Caihong, et al. Forecasting model of safe thickness for roof of karst cave tunnel based on support vector machines[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2006, 27(6): 1000-1004.
[16]赵明华,朱志仁,黄明华,等.考虑基桩嵌岩段侧阻的岩溶区顶板安全厚度计算[J].岩土力学,2018,39(11):4201-4209.
ZHAO Minghua, ZHU Zhiren, HUANG Minghua, et al. Study on thickness of safety for cave roofs suffered bending failure in karst areas[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2018, 39(11): 4201-4209.
[17]张敏思,朱万成,侯召松,等.空区顶板安全厚度和临界跨度确定的数值模拟[J].采矿与安全工程学报,2012,29(4):543-548.
ZHANG Minsi, ZHU Wancheng, HOU Zhaosong, et al.Numerical simulation for determining the safe roof thickness and critical goaf span[J]. Journal of Mining & Safety Engineering, 2012, 29(4): 543-548.
[18]张华伟,谢 妮,刘孔科,等.高层建筑桩基荷载下溶洞顶板的安全厚度[J].科学技术与工程,2017,17(32):159-167.
ZHANG Huawei, XIE Ni, LIU Kongke, et al. Safety thickness of cave roof under pile foundation of high-level building[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2017, 17(32): 159-167.
[19]李俊杰.广清高速桥梁桩基岩溶顶板安全厚度研究[J].路基工程,2018(3):171-175.
LI Junjie. Study on safety thickness of karst roof in bridge pile foundation of Guangqing highway[J]. Subgrade Engineering, 2018(3): 171-175.
[20]谢书萌.基于有限差分法的下伏岩溶对桩基承载特性的影响[J].长江科学院院报,2019,36(4):77-81.
XIE Shumeng. Investigation on influence of underlying karst on bearing capacity of pile foundation by finite difference method[J]. Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute, 2019, 36(4): 77-81.
[21]WANG P S, DING H Y, ZHANG P Y. Influence of karst caves at pile side on the bearing capacity of super-long pile foundation[J]. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2020, 2020: 4895735.
[22]《工程地质手册》编委会.工程地质手册[M].5版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2018.
Geological Engineering Handbook Editorial Committee. Geological engineering handbook[M]. 5th ed. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2018.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2025-07-10