|本期目录/Table of Contents|

[1]刘其舟,李铭发,庞伟东,等.含缺陷灌浆套筒连接在高温及冲击荷载作用下的性能劣化规律[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2025,42(04):54-63.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2024.01024]
 LIU Qizhou,LI Mingfa,PANG Weidong,et al.Performance degradation law of grouting sleeve connections with defects under high temperature and impact load[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2025,42(04):54-63.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2024.01024]
点击复制

含缺陷灌浆套筒连接在高温及冲击荷载作用下的性能劣化规律(PDF)
分享到:

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:
42卷
期数:
2025年04期
页码:
54-63
栏目:
建筑结构
出版日期:
2025-07-10

文章信息/Info

Title:
Performance degradation law of grouting sleeve connections with defects under high temperature and impact load
文章编号:
1673-2049(2025)04-0054-10
作者:
刘其舟1,2,李铭发2,庞伟东2,李楚楚2,项凡2,戴成元1,2
(1. 桂林理工大学 广西绿色建材与建筑工业化重点实验室,广西 桂林 541004; 2. 桂林理工大学 土木工程学院,广西 桂林 541004)
Author(s):
LIU Qizhou1,2, LI Mingfa2, PANG Weidong2, LI Chuchu2, XIANG Fan2, DAI Chengyuan1,2
(1. Guangxi Key Laboratory of Green Building Materials and Construction Industrialization, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, Guangxi, China)
关键词:
灌浆套筒连接 灌浆缺陷 火灾 冲击荷载 退化规律
Keywords:
grouting sleeve connection grouting defect fire impact load degradation law
分类号:
TU375.1
DOI:
10.19815/j.jace.2024.01024
文献标志码:
A
摘要:
装配式建筑需要具备一定的抗火能力,在经历火灾后也必须满足规范要求的抗冲击性能,以避免出现连续性倒塌。套筒灌浆缺陷会严重削弱装配式建筑连接的抗火及抗冲击性能,然而目前含缺陷灌浆套筒在高温及冲击荷载下的承载力劣化模型仍未明确。为此,制作了含缺陷灌浆套筒连接试件,并研究其高温后的静力拉伸及抗冲击性能。结果表明:试件主要呈现钢筋拉断和钢筋拔出两种破坏模式,相比静力拉拔,冲击荷载作用下钢筋拔出时携带的灌浆料明显增多; 无论是常温还是高温条件下,试件屈服强度的动力增大系数DDIF值均明显大于极限强度的DDIF值; 屈服强度的动力增大系数DDIF,y受温度和缺陷的影响不明显,极限强度的动力增大系数DDIF,u总体随缺陷率的增大而减小; 相比静力拉拔,冲击拉拔条件下灌浆套筒连接的强屈比、延性比明显降低,因此应充分重视动力荷载的不利影响; 建立了可表征高温后含缺陷灌浆套筒连接静力及冲击拉伸极限承载力退化规律的计算模型,该模型可为火灾后含缺陷装配式结构的性能评估提供参考。
Abstract:
Assembled buildings need to be fire-resistant and must also meet code-required impact resistance after experiencing a fire to avoid progressive collapse. Defective grouting of sleeves can severely weaken the fire and impact resistance of assembled building connections. However, the current model for the degradation of the bearing capacity of grouting sleeve with defects under high temperature and impact load is still unclear. For this reason, specimens of grouting sleeve connections with defects were fabricated and their static tensile and impact resistance performance after high temperature were investigated. The results show that the specimen mainly presents two failure modes, which are reinforcement fracture failure and reinforcement pull-out failure. Compared with static loading, the grouting material carried by reinforcement pull-out under impact loading is obviously increased. The value of the dynamic increase factor DDIF of the yield strength of the specimens is significantly greater than that of the ultimate strength whether at room temperature or high temperature. The dynamic increase factor of yield strength DDIF,y is not significantly affected by temperature and defects, and the dynamic increase factor of ultimate strength DDIF,u decreases with the increase of defect rate. The strength-yield ratio and ductility ratios of grouting sleeve connections under impact tensile conditions are significantly lower compared with static tensile, so due attention should be paid to the adverse effects of dynamic loading. A calculation model is established to characterize the degradation law of static and impact tensile ultimate bearing capacity of grouting sleeve connections with defects after high temperature. The model can provide a reference for the performance evaluation of defective assembled structures after fire.

参考文献/References:

[1] YEE A A. Social and environmental benefits of precast concrete technology[J]. PCI Journal, 2001, 46(3): 14-19.
[2]EINEA A, YAMANE T, TADROS M K. Grout-filled pipe splices for precast concrete construction[J]. PCI Journal, 1995, 40(1): 82-93.
[3]KIM Y. A study of pipe splice sleeves for use in precast beam-column connections[D]. Austin: University of Texas at Austin, 2000.
[4]LING J H, RAHMAN A B A, IBRAHIM I S. Feasibility study of grouted splice connector under tensile load[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2014, 50(1): 530-539.
[5]SEO S Y, NAM B R, KIM S K. Tensile strength of the grout-filled head-splice-sleeve[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2016, 124: 155-166.
[6]LIU C, PAN L F, LIU H, et al. Experimental and numerical investigation on mechanical properties of grouted-sleeve splices[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 260: 120441.
[7]郑永峰,郭正兴,曹 江.新型灌浆套筒的约束机理及约束应力分布[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2015,47(12):106-111.
ZHENG Yongfeng, GUO Zhengxing, CAO Jiang. Confinement mechanism and confining stress distribution of new grouting coupler for rebars splicing[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2015, 47(12): 106-111.
[8]郑永峰,郭正兴.变形灌浆套筒连接性能试验研究及有限元分析[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(3):94-102.
ZHENG Yongfeng, GUO Zhengxing. Experimental study and finite element analysis on behavior of deformed gout-filled pipe splice[J]. Journal of Building Structures, 2016, 37(3): 94-102.
[9]匡志平,郑冠雨,焦雪涛.灌浆不足对钢筋套筒连接力学性能影响试验[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2019,47(7):934-945.
KUANG Zhiping, ZHENG Guanyu, JIAO Xuetao. Experimental study on effect of mechanical behavior of grout sleeve splicing for reinforced bars due to lack of grout[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2019, 47(7): 934-945.
[10]ZHU J N, MA J F, GUO D D, et al. Study on tensile properties of semi grouted sleeve connectors after high temperature[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 302: 124088.
[11]陈年和,殷粉芳,孙 武.半灌浆套筒连接接头动态性能研究[J].施工技术,2018,47(22):60-63.
CHEN Nianhe, YIN Fenfang, SUN Wu. Research on dynamic performance of connection joint of half grout-filled coupling sleeve[J]. Construction Technology, 2018, 47(22): 60-63.
[12]YIN F F, YIN S P, CHENG Z J, et al. Experimental research on dynamic mechanical properties of fully-grouted sleeve connections[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2021, 288: 123125.
[13]郑清林,王 霓,陶 里,等.灌浆套筒力学性能影响因素分类及其机理分析[J].四川建筑科学研究,2017,43(3):5-9.
ZHENG Qinglin, WANG Ni, TAO Li, et al. The analysis on classification and forming mechanism of factors that influence the mechanical performance of grout sleeve splicing[J]. Sichuan Building Science, 2017, 43(3): 5-9.
[14]CHEN J W, WANG Z W, LIU Z Y, et al. Experimental investigation of mechanical behaviour of rebar in steel half-grouted sleeve connections with defects in water/binder ratio[J]. Structures, 2020, 26: 487-500.
[15]XU F, WANG K, WANG S G, et al. Experimental bond behavior of deformed rebars in half-grouted sleeve connections with insufficient grouting defect[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2018, 185: 264-274.
[16]解琳琳,钟勃健,苗启松,等.缺陷可检修型半灌浆套筒连接高应力反复拉压性能试验研究[J].工程力学,2022,39(5):96-104.
XIE Linlin, ZHONG Bojian, MIAO Qisong, et al. Experimental investigation on performance of defect detectable and repairable half grouted sleeve connection under high stress cyclic tension-compression load[J]. Engineering Mechanics, 2022, 39(5): 96-104.
[17]LIU Q Z, LIN Y H, LI J Z, et al. Bond strength prediction model of defective grout materials in half-grouted sleeve connections under uniaxial and cyclic loadings[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2022, 352: 128981.
[18]ZHANG W X, WANG J, ZHANG J Y, et al. Experimental study on post-fire performance of half grouted sleeve connection with construction defect[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2020, 244: 118165.
[19]钢筋套筒灌浆连接应用技术规程:JGJ 355—2015[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
Technical specification for grout sleeve splicing of rebars: JGJ 355—2015[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2015.
[20]XING X K, LIN L R, QIN H Y. Dynamic tensile behavior of steel strands at different strain rates[J]. Structures, 2021, 33: 378-389.
[21]林 莉,支旭东,范 锋,等.Q235B钢Johnson-Cook模型参数的确定[J].振动与冲击,2014,33(9):153-158,172.
LIN Li, ZHI Xudong, FAN Feng, et al. Determination of parameters of Johnson-Cook models of Q235B steel[J]. Journal of Vibration and Shock, 2014, 33(9): 153-158, 172.
[22]陈俊岭,舒文雅,李金威.Q235钢材在不同应变率下力学性能的试验研究[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2016,44(7):1071-1075.
CHEN Junling, SHU Wenya, LI Jinwei. Experimental study on dynamic mechanical property of Q235 steel at different strain rates[J]. Journal of Tongji University(Natural Science), 2016, 44(7): 1071-1075.
[23]闫东明,林 皋.混凝土动态拉伸试验及其数据分析方法研究[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006,38(4):622-625,643.
YAN Dongming, LIN Gao. Dynamic tensile experiments of concrete and its data analysis method[J]. Journal of Harbin Institute of Technology, 2006, 38(4): 622-625, 643.
[24]林 峰,顾祥林,匡昕昕,等.高应变率下建筑钢筋的本构模型[J].建筑材料学报,2008,11(1):14-20.
LIN Feng, GU Xianglin, KUANG Xinxin, et al. Constitutive models for reinforcing steel bars under high strain rates[J]. Journal of Building Materials, 2008, 11(1): 14-20.
[25]Building code requirements for structural concrete: ACI 318R-02[S]. Farmington Hills: American Concrete Institute Committee, 2002.
[26]Acceptance criteria for mechanical connector systems for steel reinforcing bars: AC-133[S]. Brea: ICC Evaluation Service Inc, 2008.
[27]钢筋机械连接技术规程:JGJ 107—2010[S].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2010.
Technical specification for mechanical splicing of steel reinforcing bars: JGJ 107—2010[S]. Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press, 2010.
[28]Structural use of concrete — part 1: code of practice for design and construction: BS-8110-1:1997[S]. London: BSI, 1997.
[29]SOUDKI K A, RIZKALLA S H, DAIKIW R W. Horizontal connections for precast concrete shear walls subjected to cyclic deformations part 2: prestressed connections[J]. PCI Journal, 1995, 40(5): 82-96.

相似文献/References:

[1]刘其舟,李金洲,吴博诚,等.反复荷载作用下含缺陷灌浆套筒约束应力及钢筋黏结强度的预测模型[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2024,41(04):51.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2022.08019]
 LIU Qizhou,LI Jinzhou,WU Bocheng,et al.Prediction model for restraint stress and reinforcement bond strength of grouted sleeves with defects under cycling loading[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2024,41(04):51.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2022.08019]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:
收稿日期:2024-01-03
基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(52368014); 广西自然科学基金项目(2022GXNSFAA035581)
作者简介:刘其舟(1986-),男,工学博士,副教授,E-mail:liuqz@glut.edu.cn。
通信作者:戴成元(1974-),男,副教授,E-mail:dcy366@126.com。
Author resumes: LIU Qizhou(1986-), male, PhD, associate professor, E-mail: liuqz@glut.edu.cn; DAI Chengyuan(1974-), male, associate professor, E-mail: dcy366@126.com.
更新日期/Last Update: 2025-07-10