|Table of Contents|

Influence of Effective Peak of Far-field Long-period Ground Motion on Elastoplastic Response of High-rise RC Frame Structures(PDF)

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

Issue:
2019年04期
Page:
94-101
Research Field:
Publishing date:

Info

Title:
Influence of Effective Peak of Far-field Long-period Ground Motion on Elastoplastic Response of High-rise RC Frame Structures
Author(s):
WANG Bo LI Zhe WU Tao LIU Bo-quan
(School of Civil Engineering, Chang'an University, Xi'an 710061, Shaanxi, China)
Keywords:
long-period ground motion high-rise structure effective peak empirical mode decomposition elasto-plastic time-history analysis
PACS:
TU313
DOI:
-
Abstract:
In order to investigate the influence mechanism of the far-field long-period ground motions(LPGMs)on the seismic responses to high-rise structures, 10 LPGMs and ordinary ground motions were selected respectively, and a high-rise RC frame structure was designed according to the current seismic design code of China. Meanwhile, the finite element model of the high-rise RC frame structure was established by ABAQUS software for calculation and analysis. Firstly, the structural response characteristics under the long-period ground motions(LPGMs)and ordinary ground motions were compared. Then, the LPGMs were decomposed into different intrinsic mode functions(IMFs)with different frequency information based on empirical mode decomposition(EMD). Each IMF component was taken out and the residual IMFs were added to reconstruct the new ground motions. Through the comparison of the structural responses between the original LPGM and the new ground motions, the influence degree of the IMF on the structural response was investigated. The results show that the seismic response of high-rise structures under LPGMs is larger than those under ordinary ground motion. The IMF components, which is close to the structural natural vibration period and has a larger peak value, has a greater impact on the seismic response, and the first high-frequency IMF component has the favorable interference effect of reducing structural response. The effective peak value and effective peak rate of LPGMs are significantly larger than those of ordinary ground motion, thus the internal mechanism that the seismic responses of high-rise structures under LPGMs are larger than those under ordinary ground motions is preliminarily revealed.

References:

[1] 周福霖,崔鸿超,安部重孝,等.东日本大地震灾害考察报告[J].建筑结构,2012,42(4):1-20.
ZHOU Fu-lin,CUI Hong-chao,SHIGETAKA Abe,et al.Inspection Report of the Disaster of the East Japan Earthquake by Sino-Japanese Joint Mission[J].Building Structure,2012,42(4):1-20.
[2]肖从真,徐培福,杜义欣,等.超高层建筑考虑长周期地震影响的另一种控制方法[J].土木工程学报,2014,47(2):12-22.
XIAO Cong-zhen,XU Pei-fu,DU Yi-xin,et al.Another Controlling Method on Long-period Seismic Responses for Super High-rise Buildings[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2014,47(2):12-22.
[3]李英民,赵晨晓,谭 潜.基于HHT地震动分量分离的长周期地震动界定方法[J].振动与冲击,2018,37(7):164-171,219.
LI Ying-min,ZHAO Chen-xiao,TAN Qian.Classification Method for Long-period Ground Motions Based on Component Decomposition with HHT[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2018,37(7):164-171,219.
[4]王 博,刘伯权,吴 涛,等.长周期地震动低频脉冲特性及反应谱分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2018,38(3):142-151.
WANG Bo,LIU Bo-quan,WU Tao,et al.Analysis of Low-frequency Pulse Characteristics and Response Spectrum for Long-period Ground Motions[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2018,38(3):142-151.
[5]王 博,刘伯权,吴 涛,等.远场长周期地震动频谱特征周期与强度指标研究[J].振动与冲击,2018,37(7):211-219.
WANG Bo,LIU Bo-quan,WU Tao,et al.Characteristic Periods and Intensity Indexes for Far-field Long-period Ground Motion Frequency Spectra[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2018,37(7):211-219.
[6]周 靖,方小丹,江 毅.远场长周期地震动反应谱拐点特征周期研究[J].建筑结构学报,2015,36(6):1-12.
ZHOU Jing,FANG Xiao-dan,JIANG Yi.Characteristic Periods of Response Spectrum for Far-field Long-period Seismic Ground Motions[J].Journal of Building Structures,2015,36(6):1-12.
[7]杜东升,王曙光,刘伟庆,等.长周期地震动影响因素及频谱参数研究[J].建筑结构学报,2014,35(增1):1-8.
DU Dong-sheng,WANG Shu-guang,LIU Wei-qing,et al.Study on Affecting Factors and Spectral Parameters of Long Period Ground Motions[J].Journal of Building Structures,2014,35(S1):1-8.
[8]李雪红,王文科,吴 迪,等.长周期地震动的特性分析及界定方法研究[J].振动工程学报,2014,27(5):685-692.
LI Xue-hong,WANG Wen-ke,WU Di,et al.The Bounded Method and Characteristics Analysis for Long-period Ground Motions[J].Journal of Vibration Engineering,2014,27(5):685-692.
[9]吴 琼,陈清军.高层框架结构长周期地震反应分析[J].结构工程师,2011,27(1):78-84.
WU Qiong,CHEN Qing-jun.Analysis on Long-period Seismic Responses for High-rise Frame Structures[J].Structural Engineers,2011,27(1):79-84.
[10]王 博.多类型长周期地震动作用下高层结构的动力行为与设计方法研究[D].西安:西安建筑科技大学,2013.
WANG Bo.Study on Dynamic Behavior and Design Method of High-rise Structures Under Multi-type Long-period Ground Motions[D].Xi'an:Xi'an University of Architecture and Technology,2013.
[11]马 华,曹 飞,唐贞云,等.高层框架结构 E-Defense 振动台试验弹塑性时程对比分析[J].地震工程与工程振动,2015,35(1):143-149.
MA Hua,CAO Fei,TANG Zhen-yun,et al.Comparative Analysis of E-Defense Shaking Table Test and Nonlinear Time History Simulation for High-rise Frame Structure[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2015,35(1):143-149.
[12]ARIGA T,KANNO Y,TAKEWAKI I.Resonant Behavior of Base-isolated High-rise Buildings Under Long-period Ground Motions[J].The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings,2006,15(3):325-338.
[13]CHEN Q J,YUAN W Z,LI Y C,et al.Dynamic Response Characteristics of Super High-rise Buildings Subjected to Long-period Ground Motions[J].Journal of Central South University,2013,20(5):1341-1353.
[14]CHUNG Y L,NAGAE T,HITAKA T,et al.Seismic Resistance Capacity of High-rise Buildings Subjected to Long-period Ground Motions:E-Defense Shaking Table Test[J].Journal of Structural Engineering,2010,136(6):637-644.
[15]TAKEWAKI I,MURAKAMI S,FUJITA K,et al.The 2011 off the Pacific Coast of Tohoku Earthquake and Response of High-rise Buildings Under Long-period Ground Motions[J].Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2011,31(11):1511-1528.
[16]王 博,白国良,代慧娟.典型地震动作用下长周期单自由度体系地震反应分析[J].振动与冲击,2013,32(15):190-196,214.
WANG Bo,BAI Guo-liang,DAI Hui-juan.Seismic Response Analysis of Long-period SDOF System Under Typical Ground Motions[J].Journal of Vibration and Shock,2013,32(15):190-196,214.
[17]郭 彦,刘文光,何文福,等.长周期地震波作用下超高层框架-核心筒减震结构动力响应分析[J].建筑结构学报,2017,38(12):68-77.
GUO Yan,LIU Wen-guang,HE Wen-fu,et al.Dynamic Response Analysis of Super High-rise Frame-core Tube Structure Under Long-period Ground Motions[J].Journal of Building Structures,2017,38(12):68-77.
[18]韩建平,苏彦兵.长周期地震动输入下某超限高层结构反应分析——以汶川地震和日本东北地震记录为例[J].建筑结构,2014,44(18):59-62.
HAN Jian-ping,SU Yan-bing.Seismic Response Analysis of an Out-of-code High-rise Building Under Long-period Ground Motion:Case Studies of Wenchuan Earthquake and Japan Tohoku Earthquake Records[J].Building Structure,2014,44(18):59-62.
[19]陈清军,袁伟泽,曹丽雅.长周期地震波作用下高层建筑结构的弹塑性动力响应分析[J].力学季刊,2011,32(3):403-410.
CHEN Qing-jun,YUAN Wei-ze,CAO Li-ya.Elasto-plastic Dynamic Response Analysis of High Rise Structures Under Long Period Ground Motion[J].Chinese Quarterly of Mechanics,2011,32(3):403-410.
[20]张郁山.希尔伯特-黄变换(HHT)与地震动时程的希尔伯特谱——方法与应用研究[D].北京:中国地震局地球物理研究所,2003.
ZHANG Yu-shan.Hilbert-Huang Transform(HHT)and Hilbert Spectrum of Earthquake Ground Motion — Study of Methods and Applications[D].Beijing:Institute of Geophysics,China Earthquake Administration,2003.
[21]GB 50011—2010,建筑抗震设计规范[S].
GB 50011—2010,Code for Seismic Design of Buildings[S].
[22]陆新征,蒋 庆,缪志伟,等.建筑抗震弹塑性分析[M].2版.北京:中国建筑工业出版社,2015.
LU Xin-zheng,JIANG Qing,MIAO Zhi-wei,et al.Elasto-plastic Analysis of Buildings Against Earthquake[M].2nd ed.Beijing:China Architecture & Building Press,2015.

Memo

Memo:
-
Last Update: 2019-07-26