«上一篇/Previous Article|本期目录/Table of Contents|下一篇/Next Article»

《建筑科学与工程学报》[ISSN:1673-2049/CN:61-1442/TU]

卷:

36卷

期数:

2019年05期

页码:

62-70

栏目:

出版日期:

2019-09-23

文章信息/Info

Title:

Size Effect of Dynamic Failure of Reinforced Concrete Column Under Axial Compression

文章编号:

1673-2049(2019)05-0062-09

作者:

周宏宇¹,袁 慧¹,邢晓帅¹,赵晓花²,张雅然¹

(1. 北京工业大学 建筑工程学院,北京 100124; 2. 中国建筑技术集团有限公司,北京 100013)

Author(s):

ZHOU Hong-yu¹, YUAN Hui¹, XING Xiao-shuai¹, ZHAO Xiao-hua², ZHANG Ya-ran¹

(1. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing 100124, China; 2. China Building Technique Group Co.,Ltd, Beijing 100013, China)

关键词:

钢筋混凝土短柱;  轴心受压;  尺寸效应;  应变率效应;  承载力;  修正参数

Keywords:

reinforced concrete short column;  axial compression;  size effect;  strain rate effect;  bearing capacity;  correction factor

分类号:

TU375.3

DOI:

-

文献标志码:

A

摘要:

为研究地震荷载作用下钢筋混凝土(RC)构件动态破坏的尺寸效应,对6根不同尺寸的钢筋混凝土短柱进行了不同加载速率下的轴心受压试验(应变率在1×10^-5～1×10^-2 s^-1范围内),根据试验结果从荷载-位移曲线、延性和钢筋与混凝土应变等方面分析了应变率和尺寸效应共同影响下RC柱的轴压破坏特性。基于试验数据,提出了钢筋混凝土短柱轴心受压承载力计算修正参数。研究结果表明:在所研究的应变率范围内,RC短柱轴压破坏特征受加载速率变化的影响不显著,但随尺寸变化存在一定差异性; RC短柱动态破坏极限承载力依然存在尺寸效应,整体表现出承载力随尺寸增大而降低的趋势,但其降低效应显著小于应变率的提高效应,峰值承载力处的位移随加载速率的提高而降低; RC短柱延性随尺寸增大而增大,随应变率提高而降低,且尺寸的影响大于应变率; 提出的钢筋混凝土短柱轴心受压承载力计算修正参数对于同类问题的定量计算和分析具有参考价值。

Abstract:

In order to study the size effect of dynamic failure of reinforced concrete(RC)member under seismic load, six reinforced concrete short columns with different sizes were subjected to axial compression tests at different loading rates(the strain rate was in the range of 1×10^-5 to 1×10^-2 s^-1). According to test results, the failure characteristics of RC axial compression columns under the influence of strain rate and size effect were analyzed from load-displacement curve, ductility, reinforcement and concrete strain and other aspects. Based on the measured data, a correction factor for calculating the bearing capacity of RC axial compression short columns was proposed. The study results show that the change of the loading velocity has no obvious effect on the failure characteristics of RC axial compression short columns in the studied range of strain rate, but there is a certain difference when size changes. The ultimate bearing capacity also has size effect, as a whole, it decreases when size increases, but its reduction effect is much smaller than that of strain rate. The displacement at peak load decreases with the increase of loading rate. The ductility increases when size increases but decreases when strain rate increases, and the influence of the size is greater than the strain rate. The proposed correction factor for calculating the bearing capacity of RC axial compression short columns will provide reference for quantitative calculation and analysis of similar problems.

参考文献/References:

[1] 王 钧,任靖豪,郭大鹏.短切玄武岩纤维混凝土基本力学性能的尺寸效应[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2015,32(5):96-103.
WANG Jun,REN Jing-hao,GUO Da-peng.Size Effect of Basic Mechanical Properties of Chopped Basalt Fiber Reinforced Concrete[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2015,32(5):96-103.
[2]JEONG C Y,KIM H G,KIM S W,et al.Size Effect on Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Beams with Tension Reinforcement Ratio[J].Advances in Structural Engineering,2016,20(4):582-594.
[3]周宏宇,杨聪昆,杜修力,等.钢筋混凝土梁受弯抗震性能尺寸效应试验研究[J].应用基础与工程科学学报,2018,26(2):346-356.
ZHOU Hong-yu,YANG Cong-kun,DU Xiu-li,et al.Experimental Study on Size Effect of Seismic Behavior of RC Beams[J].Journal of Basic Science and Engineering,2018,26(2):346-356.
[4]袁非凡.FRP加固钢筋混凝土柱偏心受压性能的尺寸效应研究[D].北京:北京建筑大学,2017.
YUAN Fei-fan.Research of Size Effect on Eccentric Compressive Behavior of FRP Reinforced Concrete Column[D].Beijing:Beijing University of Civil Engineering and Architecture,2017.
[5]周胤呈.基于尺寸效应的有腹筋钢筋混凝土梁的剪切强度研究[D].重庆:重庆交通大学,2017.
ZHOU Yin-cheng.Shear Strength Study for Reinforced Concrete Beams with Web Reinforcements Against Size Effect[D].Chongqing:Chongqing Jiaotong University,2017.
[6]杜修力,卢爱贞,赵 均.小偏心钢筋混凝土柱受压性能的尺寸效应试验[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2015,32(1):1-7.
DU Xiu-li,LU Ai-zhen,ZHAO Jun.Experiment on Size Effect of Small Eccentric Reinforced Concrete Columns Under Compressive Loads[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2015,32(1):1-7.
[7]王作虎,刘晶波,杜修力.单调轴压荷载下考虑尺寸效应的FRP加固混凝土圆柱应力-应变关系[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2013,30(4):78-83.
WANG Zuo-hu,LIU Jing-bo,DU Xiu-li.Stress-strain Relation of Circular Concrete Columns Strengthened with FRP Considering Size Effect Under Monotonic Axial Loading[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2013,30(4):78-83.
[8]JIA B,TAO J L,LI Z L,et al.Effects of Temperature and Strain Rate on Dynamic Properties of Concrete[J].Transactions of Tianjin University,2008,14(1):511-513.
[9]王德斌,范国玺,刘 军,等.应变率对钢筋混凝土柱动态性能影响的研究[J].地震工程与工程振动,2016,36(3):76-83.
WANG De-bin,FAN Guo-xi,LIU Jun,et al.Study of the Influence of Strain Rate on the Dynamic Behavior of RC Columns[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2016,36(3):76-83.
[10]李 杰,晏小欢,任晓丹.不同加载速率下混凝土单轴受压性能大样本试验研究[J].建筑结构学报,2016,37(8):66-75.
LI Jie,YAN Xiao-huan,REN Xiao-dan.Large-sample Experimental Study on Uniaxial Compressive Behavior of Concrete Under Different Loading Rates[J].Journal of Building Structures,2016,37(8):66-75.
[11]吴 俊,杜修力,李 亮.中高应变率下沥青混凝土动力增长系数研究[J].天津大学学报:自然科学与工程技术版,2017,50(9):921-930.
WU Jun,DU Xiu-li,LI Liang.Dynamic Increase Factor of Asphalt Concrete Under Middle to High Strain Rates[J].Journal of Tianjin University:Science and Technology,2017,50(9):921-930.
[12]李忠献,刘泽锋.混凝土动态本构模型综述[J].天津大学学报:自然科学与工程技术版,2015,48(10):853-863.
LI Zhong-xian,LIU Ze-feng.Review of Concrete Dynamic Constitutive Model[J].Journal of Tianjin University:Science and Technology,2015,48(10):853-863.
[13]张 皓,李宏男.考虑应变率效应的钢筋混凝土框架结构弹塑性地震反应分析[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2011,28(3):74-82.
ZHANG Hao,LI Hong-nan.Elastic-plastic Seismic Response Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structure with Strain Rate Effect[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2011,28(3):74-82.
[14]王文明,李宏男.考虑应变率效应的Pushover分析方法[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2011,28(2):69-74.
WANG Wen-ming,LI Hong-nan.Pushover Analysis Method Considering Strain Rate Effect[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2011,28(2):69-74.
[15]许 斌,王治原,陈洪兵.钢筋混凝土柱动力滞回性能两尺度数值模拟[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2017,34(3):16-23.
XU Bin,WANG Zhi-yuan,CHEN Hong-bing.Numerical Simulation on Dynamic Hysteretic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns with Two-scale Model[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2017,34(3):16-23.
[16]林 皋,闫东明,肖诗云,等.应变速率对混凝土特性及工程结构地震响应的影响[J].土木工程学报,2005,38(11):1-8,63.
LIN Gao,YAN Dong-ming,XIAO Shi-yun,et al.Strain Rate Effects on the Behavior of Concrete and the Seismic Response of Concrete Structures[J].China Civil Engineering Journal,2005,38(11):1-8,63.
[17]王 敏,彭 刚,田 为,等.混凝土尺寸效应的动态率相关性试验研究[J].中国农村水利水电,2014(6):176-179.
WANG Min,PENG Gang,TIAN Wei,et al.Experimental Research on the Concrete Size Effection on Dynamic Rate Dependent Characteristics[J].China Rural Water and Hydropower,2014(6):176-179.
[18]SUN J S,MA L J,DOU Y M,et al.Effect of Strain Rate on the Compressive Mechanical Properties of Concrete[J].Advanced Materials Research,2012,450-451:244-247.
[19]李 敏,李宏男,张 皓,等.中强混凝土应变率效应的试验研究与数值模拟[J].混凝土,2014(4):34-37.
LI Min,LI Hong-nan,ZHANG Hao,et al.Experimental and Numerical Study on the Effects of Strain Rate of Middle Strength Concrete[J].Concrete,2014(4):34-37.
[20]GB 50010—2010,混凝土结构设计规范[S].
GB 50010—2010,Code for Design of Concrete Structures[S].
[21]王德斌,李宏男.应变率对钢筋混凝土柱动态特性的影响[J].地震工程与工程振动,2011,31(6):67-72.
WANG De-bin,LI Hong-nan.Effects of Strain Rate on Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Column[J].Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics,2011,31(6):67-72.
[22]江 洲.钢筋混凝土柱动力性能试验及数值模拟研究[D].长沙:湖南大学,2012.
JIANG Zhou.Experimental and Numerical Study on Dynamic Behavior of Reinforced Concrete Columns[D].Changsha:Hunan University,2012.

相似文献/References:

[1]裴万吉,赵均海,魏雪英.钢管混凝土的截面形式及其承载力分析[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2006,23(01):49.
　PEI Wan-ji,ZHAO Jun-hai,WEI Xue-ying.Analysis of Section Types of Concrete-Filled Steel Tube and Its Load Capacity[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2006,23(05):49.
[2]邓宗才,姚军锁.箍筋约束超高性能混凝土柱受压性能研究进展[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2020,37(01):14.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2019.01046]
　DENG Zong-cai,YAO Jun-suo.Research Progress on Compressive Behavior of Stirrup-confined Ultra-high Performance Concrete Columns[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2020,37(05):14.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2019.01046]
[3]高小育,段 海,杨正朴,等.CFRP加固圆形钢管抗压承载力研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2020,37(06):55.
　GAO Xiao-yu,DUAN Hai,YANG Zheng-pu,et al.Research on Compressive Carrying Capacity of Circular Steel Tubes Strengthened with Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2020,37(05):55.
[4]张剑瑞,何泽朝,马恺泽.FRP-钢复合管约束高强混凝土轴压短柱试验研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2022,39(06):113.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.11019]
　ZHANG Jian-rui,HE Ze-zhao,MA Kai-ze.Experimental Research on FRP-steel Composite Tube Confined High-strength Concrete Short Column Under Axial Compression[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2022,39(05):113.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.11019]
[5]尹亚运,刘川琦,李书进,等.纤维橡胶砂浆的力学性能与砌体轴压试验[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2023,40(02):19.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.10072]
　YIN Yayun,LIU Chuanqi,LI Shujin,et al.Mechanical properties of fiber rubber mortar and axial compression test of masonry[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2023,40(05):19.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.10072]
[6]程东辉,姚宇航,王 丽.CFRP布对不同截面混凝土柱加固性能分析[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2023,40(03):40.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.12004]
　CHENG Donghui,YAO Yuhang,WANG Li.Analysis of reinforcement performance of CFRP strips on concrete columns with different cross-sections[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2023,40(05):40.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.12004]
[7]张玉琢,刘进隆,徐 倩,等.钢管煤矸石混凝土轴压短柱极限承载力计算方法研究[J].建筑科学与工程学报,2023,40(03):50.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.11148]
　ZHANG Yuzhuo,LIU Jinlong,XU Qian,et al.Steel tube coal gangue concrete axial pressure short column ultimate bearing capacity calculation method research[J].Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering,2023,40(05):50.[doi:10.19815/j.jace.2021.11148]

备注/Memo

备注/Memo:

收稿日期:2018-12-14 基金项目:国家自然科学基金项目(51378030,51978012); 北京市自然科学基金京津冀合作专项项目(J160002); 北京市自然科学基金项目(8152004) 作者简介:周宏宇(1976-),男,黑龙江哈尔滨人,副教授,工学博士,博士后,E-mail:zhouhy@emails.bjut.edu.cn。

常用功能

更新日期/Last Update: 2019-09-29